Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 41 out of 100. Getting a diagnosis

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

is a heuristic that seeks to develop methodologies capable of identifying subtle behavior(s) that may flag emerging AD and other dementia related syndromes. Recent research suggests that digital neuropsychological assessment technology may be the platform that can realize the goals of precision neurocognition, i.e., the early detection of neurocognitive difficulties that are prognostic for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. Past research associating 100% correct or statistically within normal limits responding using neuropsychological tests with time-based parameters obtained while participants undergo assessment is reviewed. Recent research with community dwelling and memory clinic participants examined test scores obtained using commonly available neuropsychological tests. This research extracted a number of discrete latency measures that clearly dissociate between groups, despite final test scores that are either 100% correct or statistically within normal limits. In sum, past research using digitally administered neuropsychological tests suggests that the goals of precision neurocognition as related to the early identification of neurodegenerative illness may be realized via an analysis of time derived, process-based behavior using digital assessment technology. Latency or time-based parameters as described in recent research could form the basis of a range of neurocognitive biomarkers for identifying people at risk for developing AD, other dementing disorders, and MCI.

Key findings

Why it matters

This paper proposes that digital neuropsychological assessment, by analysing time-based measures, may help detect early cognitive difficulties that are prognostic for mild cognitive impairment and dementia. It is about early detection and does not report any treatment, cure or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 41/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 3 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 41 of 100.41 of 100 points earned59 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of Alzheimer s Disease)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Journal of Alzheimer s Disease: journal h-index 218 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 9 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 3.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 5.7× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 9 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Louisa I. Thompson: h-index 14 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of Pennsylvania: institution h-index 1,859 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 3 / 3 OpenAlex lists 13 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40262110)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 41 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Libon, D. J., Swenson, R. A., Langford, D., Cosentino, S., Price, C. C., Lamar, M., et al. (2025). Precision neurocognition: An emerging diagnostic paradigm leveraging digital cognitive assessment technology. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251325725

Vancouver

Libon DJ, Swenson RA, Langford D, Cosentino S, Price CC, Lamar M, et al. Precision neurocognition: An emerging diagnostic paradigm leveraging digital cognitive assessment technology. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. 2025. doi:10.1177/13872877251325725. PMID: 40262110.

BibTeX

@article{libon2025-40262110,
  author  = {Libon, David J. and Swenson, Rodney A. and Langford, Dianne and Cosentino, Stephanie and Price, Catherine C. and Lamar, Melissa and Emrani, Sheina and Au, Rhoda and others},
  title   = {{Precision neurocognition: An emerging diagnostic paradigm leveraging digital cognitive assessment technology}},
  journal = {Journal of Alzheimer s Disease},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1177/13872877251325725},
  pmid    = {40262110},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251325725}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Getting a diagnosis

Also tagged “assessment”

840 studies in the library carry the topic tag “assessment”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 840 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Getting a diagnosis

See all studies in Getting a diagnosis →