Practice parameter: Assessing patients in a neurology practice for risk of falls (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Objective To develop a practice parameter for screening methods and assessments of risk for falls pertaining to patients likely to be seen in neurology practices. Methods Relevant literature was systematically reviewed and strength of evidence classified based on the American Academy of Neurology's criteria (Level A: established; Level B: probable; Level C: possible). Results An increased risk of falls is established among persons with diagnoses of stroke, dementia, and disorders of gait and balance (Level A) and probable among patients with Parkinson disease, peripheral neuropathy, lower extremity weakness or sensory loss, and substantial vision loss (Level B). A history of falling in the past year strongly predicts the likelihood of future falls (Level A). Screening measures have been developed to further assess risks of falls, including functional assessments that may be useful (Levels B and C). Several of these assess overlapping neurologic functions--i.e., gait, mobility, and balance--and there is insufficient evidence to assess whether they offer benefit beyond that provided by a standard neurologic examination. Conclusions Patients with neurologic or general conditions associated with an increased risk of falling should be asked about recent falls and further examined for the presence of specific neurologic deficits that predict falls, which include gait and balance disorders; deficits of lower extremity strength, sensation, and coordination; and cognitive impairments. If substantial risks of falls are identified, appropriate interventions that are described in other evidence-based guidelines may be considered.

Key findings

• Results An increased risk of falls is established among persons with diagnoses of stroke, dementia, and disorders of gait and balance (Level A) and probable among patients with Parkinson disease, peripheral neuropathy, lower extremity weakness or sensory loss, and substantial vision loss (Level B).
• Conclusions Patients with neurologic or general conditions associated with an increased risk of falling should be asked about recent falls and further examined for the presence of specific neurologic deficits that predict falls, which include gait and balance disorders; deficits of lower extremity strength, sensation, and coordination; and cognitive impairments.

Study details

• Evidence strengthLow

Read the original

• DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000299085.18976.20
• PubMed: 18250292
• Original source →

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

@article{thurman2008-18250292,
  author  = {Thurman, D. J. and Stevens, J. A. and Rao, J. K. and {Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology}},
  title   = {{Practice parameter: Assessing patients in a neurology practice for risk of falls (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology}},
  journal = {Neurology},
  year    = {2008},
  doi     = {10.1212/01.wnl.0000299085.18976.20},
  pmid    = {18250292},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000299085.18976.20}
}

Related studies in Clinical safety

• Practice parameter: risk of driving and Alzheimer's disease (an evidence-based review) [RETIRED]: report of the quality standards subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology Neurology · 2000-06-01 · usefulness score 71/100
• Pharmacologic Treatment of Insomnia Disorder: An Evidence Report for a Clinical Practice Guideline by the American College of Physicians Annals of internal medicine · 2016-05-03 · usefulness score 47/100
• Adverse Health Effects of Frailty: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Middle-Aged and Older Adults With Implications for Evidence-Based Practice Worldviews on evidence-based nursing · 2021-06-02 · usefulness score 74/100
• The American Psychiatric Association Practice Guideline on the Use of Antipsychotics to Treat Agitation or Psychosis in Patients With Dementia American Journal of Psychiatry · 2016-05-01 · usefulness score 40/100
• Objective assessments for walking aid prescription in balance impairment and falls risk: a scoping review of current evidence Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · 2025-05-29 · usefulness score 37/100
• European Stroke Organisation and European Academy of Neurology joint guidelines on post-stroke cognitive impairment European stroke journal · 2021-09-01 · usefulness score 71/100

Similar studies

• Practice parameter: management of dementia (an evidence-based review) [RETIRED]. Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology 2001 · Caregiving
• Practice parameter: diagnosis of dementia (an evidence-based review). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology 2001 · Getting a diagnosis
• Neurology and the kidney 1998 · Clinical safety
• Falls in dementia patients 1993 · Clinical safety
• Falls and Parkinson's disease 1989 · Clinical safety
• Practice parameter update: evaluation and management of driving risk in dementia: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology 2010 · Prevention and risk

More on Clinical safety

• A review that covers this ground Risk Factors for Malnutrition in Older Adults: A Systematic Review of the Literature Based on Longitudinal Data Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2016-05-16 · usefulness score 69/100
• Newest in this subject Short-Horizon Metrics and the Persistence of Capacity-Debiting Practices in Nursing Homes Preprints.org · 2026-10-13 · Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed · usefulness score 16/100
• Newest in this subject Expert-Derived Components of Person-Centred Nursing Intervention for People with Dementia and/or Cognitive Impairment in a Hospital Experiencing Distress Research Square · 2026-09-29 · Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed · usefulness score 16/100

See all studies in Clinical safety →