Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 54 out of 100. Treatments

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Conclusions Lack of supportive evidence for SSRIs as cognition enhancers or disease modifiers in AD is the result of omissions in clinical trial design, as opposed to reporting of negative outcomes.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Chow, T. W., Pollock, B. G., & Milgram, N. W. (2007). Potential cognitive enhancing and disease modification effects of SSRIs for Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment.

Vancouver

Chow TW, Pollock BG, Milgram NW. Potential cognitive enhancing and disease modification effects of SSRIs for Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment. 2007. PMID: 19300592.

BibTeX

@article{chow2007-19300592,
  author  = {Chow, T. W. and Pollock, B. G. and Milgram, N. W.},
  title   = {{Potential cognitive enhancing and disease modification effects of SSRIs for Alzheimer's disease}},
  journal = {Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment},
  year    = {2007},
  pmid    = {19300592}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. This record has no DOI, so the citation leaves it out. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This paper concludes that the lack of supportive evidence for SSRIs as cognition enhancers or disease modifiers in Alzheimer disease is due to omissions in clinical trial design rather than to reported negative outcomes. It does not provide evidence that SSRIs treat or prevent the disease.

Study details

How this study scored 54/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 11 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 1 of 2; Times cited 4 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 1 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 54 of 100.54 of 100 points earned46 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a randomised controlled trial. Scored zero for sample size, effect reported and studied in people because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment: journal h-index 126 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 11 / 12 A randomised controlled trial
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2007 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 1 / 2 Randomised (as stated in the record)
Times cited 4 / 7 Cited 40 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.9 citations a year over 21 year(s) since 2007
Impact for its field and year 1 / 6 Cited 0.7× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 5 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Norton William Milgram: h-index 55 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of Toronto: institution h-index 1,923 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 19300592)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 54 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Related studies in Treatments

Also tagged “double-blind”

783 studies in the library carry the topic tag “double-blind”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 783 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Treatments

See all studies in Treatments →