Topic: Genetics and APOE
In this paper we explore the phenomenon of pleiotropy in neurodegenerative diseases, focusing on Alzheimer's disease (AD). We summarize the various techniques developed to investigate pleiotropy among traits, elaborating in the polygenic risk scores (PRS) analysis. PRS was designed to assess a cumulative effect of a large number of SNPs for association with a disease and, later for disease risk prediction. Since genetic predictions rely on heritability, we discuss SNP-based heritability from genome-wide association studies and its contribution to the prediction accuracy of PRS. We review work examining pleiotropy in neurodegenerative diseases and related phenotypes and biomarkers. We conclude that the exploitation of pleiotropy may aid in the identification of novel genes and provide further insights in the disease mechanisms, and along with PRS analysis, may be advantageous for precision medicine.
Key findings
- We conclude that the exploitation of pleiotropy may aid in the identification of novel genes and provide further insights in the disease mechanisms, and along with PRS analysis, may be advantageous for precision medicine.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Genetics →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 39/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 22 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 39 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Neurobiology of disease) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 2 / 5 | 2020 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 32445791) |
| Free to read | — / 2 | Access not recorded — left out of this score |
| Points | 22 / 56 | Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 22 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 39 out of 100. |
| Total | 39 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Bellou, E., Stevenson-Hoare, J., & Escott-Price, V. (2020). Polygenic risk and pleiotropy in neurodegenerative diseases. Neurobiology of disease. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2020.104953
Vancouver
Bellou E, Stevenson-Hoare J, Escott-Price V. Polygenic risk and pleiotropy in neurodegenerative diseases. Neurobiology of disease. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2020.104953. PMID: 32445791.
BibTeX
@article{bellou2020-32445791,
author = {Bellou, Eftychia and Stevenson-Hoare, Joshua and Escott-Price, Valentina},
title = {{Polygenic risk and pleiotropy in neurodegenerative diseases}},
journal = {Neurobiology of disease},
year = {2020},
doi = {10.1016/j.nbd.2020.104953},
pmid = {32445791},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2020.104953}
}
Related studies in Genetics
Also tagged “genetics”
346 studies in the library carry the topic tag “genetics”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 346 tagged studies.