Home › Research › Brain scans and imaging
Olfactory deficit in idiopathic rapid eye movements sleep behavior disorder
Fantini ML, Postuma RB, Montplaisir J, Ferini-Strambi L.. Brain research bulletin, 2006-08-07
Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models
Introduction REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is a parasomnia characterized by a loss of atonia and an increased phasic muscle activity during REM sleep. Idiopathic RBD frequently herald an alpha-synucleinopathy, including such as Parkinson's disease (PD) and dementia with Lewy Body (DLB). Pathological changes in the anterior olfactory nucleus and olfactory loss occur very early in the course of PD and DLB. The aim of the study was to assess olfactory function in a large group of idiopathic RBD patients. Methods Fifty-four consecutive polysomnographically-confirmed iRBD patients (44 men, 10 women; mean age: 69.2+/-8.3 years; mean Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III (UPDRS-III) score: 4.9+/-4.3) and 54 age and gender-matched control subjects underwent the Brief University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (B-SIT). Results A marked olfactory impairment was observed in the RBD group (mean B-SIT score: 7.1+/-2.5 versus 9.4+/-1.8; p < 0.0001), with 33 (61.1%) RBD patients versus 9 (16.6%) controls showing abnormal olfactory function (p < 0.0001). No correlation was found between the degree of olfactory loss and either duration of RBD symptoms or UPDRS-III score. Deficit in recognize paint thinner odorant showed the highest positive predictive value (0.95) for identifying idiopathic RBD. Conclusions The olfactory deficit found in most idiopathic RBD patients shares similarities with that described in PD and may be a sign of a widespread neurodegenerative process. Its detection may help in identifying subjects at higher risk of developing an alpha-synucleinopathy-mediated neurodegeneration.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Fantini, M. L., Postuma, R. B., Montplaisir, J., & Ferini-Strambi, L. (2006). Olfactory deficit in idiopathic rapid eye movements sleep behavior disorder. Brain research bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2006.07.008
Vancouver
Fantini ML, Postuma RB, Montplaisir J, Ferini-Strambi L. Olfactory deficit in idiopathic rapid eye movements sleep behavior disorder. Brain research bulletin. 2006. doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2006.07.008. PMID: 17027774.
BibTeX
@article{fantini2006-17027774,
author = {Fantini, M. L. and Postuma, R. B. and Montplaisir, J. and Ferini-Strambi, L.},
title = {{Olfactory deficit in idiopathic rapid eye movements sleep behavior disorder}},
journal = {Brain research bulletin},
year = {2006},
doi = {10.1016/j.brainresbull.2006.07.008},
pmid = {17027774},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2006.07.008}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Results A marked olfactory impairment was observed in the RBD group (mean B-SIT score: 7.1+/-2.5 versus 9.4+/-1.8; p < 0.0001), with 33 (61.1%) RBD patients versus 9 (16.6%) controls showing abnormal olfactory function (p < 0.0001).
- Its detection may help in identifying subjects at higher risk of developing an alpha-synucleinopathy-mediated neurodegeneration.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Brain scans & tests →
Study details
- Effect size61.1%; 16.6%
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 40/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 23 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 40 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Brain research bulletin) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 2006 — older than 20 years, still counted |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 2 / 3 | Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 17027774) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 23 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 23 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 40 out of 100. |
| Total | 40 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related studies in Brain scans and imaging
Also tagged “movement-sleep”
2 studies in the library carry the topic tag “movement-sleep”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 2 tagged studies.