Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 75 out of 100. End-of-life care

Topic: Health services, long-term care and technology

Twenty-three studies from 12 countries were included (8 cluster RCTs, 9 individual RCTs, 6 non-randomized trials). Nurse-led programs improved care planning (≥75% documentation rates), reduced caregiver decisional conflict (20-30%), and enhanced communication quality (by up to 20 percentage points). Pain detection increased by 41%, with validated tools reducing pain scores by up to 30%. Psychosocial therapies reduced agitation by up to 25% and improved care cooperation. Multicomponent models decreased emergency visits and improved transitions, with over 40% increases in advance directive completion. Risk of bias varied by design and domain. Nurse-led palliative care interventions show consistent benefits in communication, symptom control, and caregiver support. However, evidence on long-term caregiver outcomes is limited, and heterogeneity in design and measurement limits comparability. Standardized, scalable models are needed to fully integrate nursing-led approaches into palliative dementia care.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 75/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 12 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 42 of the 56 points it could be judged on, which is 75 of 100. Total 75 of 100.42 of the 56 points we could judge = 75 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a systematic review of all the studies on the question. Scored zero for sample size and studied in people because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 42 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 75 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 12 / 12 A systematic review of all the studies on the question
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 A review of other studies — randomisation is not credited here
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41089743)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 42 / 56 Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 42 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 75 out of 100.
Total 75 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Pujante, V. G. B., Sami, W., Al-Kuwari, N. F., & Rizvi, M. R. (2025). Nursing Interventions in Palliative Care for Advanced Dementia: A Systematic Review of Symptom, Relief, Comfort, and Caregiver Support. Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare. https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.s546183

Vancouver

Pujante VGB, Sami W, Al-Kuwari NF, Rizvi MR. Nursing Interventions in Palliative Care for Advanced Dementia: A Systematic Review of Symptom, Relief, Comfort, and Caregiver Support. Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare. 2025. doi:10.2147/jmdh.s546183. PMID: 41089743.

BibTeX

@article{pujante2025-41089743,
  author  = {Pujante, Vianca Gloriene Barcoma and Sami, Waqas and Al-Kuwari, Noof Fahad and Rizvi, Moattar Raza},
  title   = {{Nursing Interventions in Palliative Care for Advanced Dementia: A Systematic Review of Symptom, Relief, Comfort, and Caregiver Support}},
  journal = {Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.2147/jmdh.s546183},
  pmid    = {41089743},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.s546183}
}

Related studies in End-of-life care

Also in End-of-life care

116 studies in the library are filed under End-of-life care with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The End-of-life care hub.

Similar studies

More on End-of-life care

See all studies in End-of-life care →