Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 45 out of 100. Vascular contributions

Topic: Gut, metabolism and diet

Mercury remains a pervasive environmental neurotoxicant strongly implicated in hippocampal oxidative injury and dementia-related cognitive decline, yet safe multi-target agents against its neurotoxicity remain limited. This study investigated the neuroprotective potential of the Syzygium aromaticum (clove) ethyl acetate fraction (SEAF) against mercuric chloride (HgCl 2 )-induced hippocampal neurotoxicity using an integrated network pharmacology, molecular docking, and in vivo evaluations. GC-MS profiling of SEAF (5.29% yield) identified 13 abundant metabolites, dominated by eugenyl acetate, eugenol, 14-hydroxycaryophyllene, and β-caryophyllene. Consensus screening with SwissADME and ADMETlab 3.0 identified eugenyl acetate, benzyl benzoate, and 1-methylcyclododecanol as blood-brain barrier (BBB)-permeant. Network pharmacology integrating SwissTargetPrediction, TargetNet, GeneCards, and the Therapeutic Target Database revealed 16 overlapping dementia-associated targets, with NFKB1 emerging alongside other genes as the principal hub governing nuclear receptor signalling, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation pathways. Molecular docking against NMDA, GABA_A, NF-κB1, and acetylcholinesterase receptors showed eugenyl acetate and benzyl benzoate consistently exhibited the strongest and most consistent binding affinities among the BBB-permeant metabolites. In vivo , pretreatment with SEAF (250–1000 mg/kg) dose-dependently attenuated HgCl₂-induced deficits in object location and Y-maze performance, restored hippocampal superoxide dismutase and catalase activities, reduced malondialdehyde levels, and preserved CA1/CA3 pyramidal cell architecture, with the 1000 mg/kg dose approximating Vitamin E and control groups. These convergent computational and experimental findings identify SEAF as a multi-target neuroprotective agent that mitigates mercury-induced hippocampal neurodegeneration through coordinated antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and neurotransmission-modulating mechanisms, supporting its further development as a candidate nutraceutical neuroprotectant against heavy-metal-associated dementia risk.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Etukudo, E. M., Usman, I. M., Oviosun, A., Ojiakor, V. O., Owembabazi, E., Aja, P. M., et al. (2026). Multi-Target Neuroprotection by Syzygium aromaticum Ethyl Acetate Fraction Against Mercuric Chloride-Induced Hippocampal Toxicity: Insights from Network Pharmacology, Molecular Docking, and In Vivo Evaluation. F1000Res. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.186494.1

Vancouver

Etukudo EM, Usman IM, Oviosun A, Ojiakor VO, Owembabazi E, Aja PM, et al. Multi-Target Neuroprotection by Syzygium aromaticum Ethyl Acetate Fraction Against Mercuric Chloride-Induced Hippocampal Toxicity: Insights from Network Pharmacology, Molecular Docking, and In Vivo Evaluation. F1000Res. 2026. doi:10.12688/f1000research.186494.1.

BibTeX

@article{etukudo2026-c4612b37,
  author  = {Etukudo, E. M. and Usman, I. M. and Oviosun, A. and Ojiakor, V. O. and Owembabazi, E. and Aja, P. M. and Anyanwu, E.},
  title   = {{Multi-Target Neuroprotection by Syzygium aromaticum Ethyl Acetate Fraction Against Mercuric Chloride-Induced Hippocampal Toxicity: Insights from Network Pharmacology, Molecular Docking, and In Vivo Evaluation}},
  journal = {F1000Res},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.12688/f1000research.186494.1},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.186494.1}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 45/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 26 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 45 of 100. Total 45 of 100.26 of the 58 points we could judge = 45 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 26 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 45 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (F1000Res)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 26 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 26 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 45 out of 100.
Total 45 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Related studies in Vascular contributions

Also tagged “repurposing”

235 studies in the library carry the topic tag “repurposing”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 235 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Vascular contributions

See all studies in Vascular contributions →