Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 51 out of 100. Health systems and care delivery

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Results The 32 796 872 Medicare beneficiaries in the cohort had a mean (SD) age of 74.0 (12.5) years and included 18 228 513 females (55.6%). Differences in contract exit rates were associated with higher rates of disenrollment from Medicare Advantage to traditional Medicare among beneficiaries with ADRD vs those without ADRD (16.3% [95% CI, 16.2%-16.3%] vs 15.1% [95% CI, 15.1%-15.1%]). Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study of the Medicare population with acute and postacute care use, beneficiaries with ADRD had increasing enrollment in the Medicare Advantage program, proportional to the growth in overall enrollment, but their disenrollment from Medicare Advantage in the following year remained higher compared with beneficiaries without ADRD. The findings highlight the need to understand the factors associated with higher disenrollment rates and determine whether such rates reflect access or quality challenges for beneficiaries with ADRD.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

James, H. O., Trivedi, A. N., & Meyers, D. J. (2023). Medicare Advantage Enrollment and Disenrollment Among Persons With Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias. JAMA Health Forum. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.3080

Vancouver

James HO, Trivedi AN, Meyers DJ. Medicare Advantage Enrollment and Disenrollment Among Persons With Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias. JAMA Health Forum. 2023. doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.3080.

BibTeX

@article{james2023-95840367,
  author  = {James, Hannah O. and Trivedi, Amal N. and Meyers, David J.},
  title   = {{Medicare Advantage Enrollment and Disenrollment Among Persons With Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias}},
  journal = {JAMA Health Forum},
  year    = {2023},
  doi     = {10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.3080},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.3080}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study found that Medicare beneficiaries with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias left Medicare Advantage for traditional Medicare at a slightly higher rate than those without dementia. It does not test any treatment or prevention for Alzheimer's disease, but it points to a need to understand whether these higher disenrollment rates reflect problems with access or quality of care.

Study details

How this study scored 51/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 4 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 3 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 3 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 51 of 100.51 of 100 points earned49 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a snapshot of people at one point in time. Scored zero for randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (JAMA Health Forum)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 JAMA Health Forum: journal h-index 60 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 4 / 12 A snapshot of people at one point in time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2023 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 18 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 3 / 7 Cited 26 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 5.2 citations a year over 5 year(s) since 2023
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 5.3× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 3 / 6 Cited by 11 other studies in this library
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 26 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author David J. Meyers: h-index 27 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Brown University: institution h-index 1,120 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 51 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

11 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.

Related studies in Health systems and care delivery

Also tagged “prevalence”

1,224 studies in the library carry the topic tag “prevalence”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,224 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Health systems and care delivery

See all studies in Health systems and care delivery →