Home › Research › Cognitive tests and assessment
Increased intraindividual variability in reaction time performance is associated with emerging cognitive decline in cognitively unimpaired adults
Jutten RJ, Amariglio RE, Maruff P, Properzi MJ, Rentz DM, Johnson KA, Sperling RA, Papp KV.. Neuropsychology, 2023-11-16
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
Objective To investigate whether intraindividual variability (IIV) in reaction time (RT) over monthly administered cognitive tasks is increased in cognitively unimpaired older adults who are at risk for cognitive decline, and whether this is independent of mean RT performance. Method N = 109 cognitively unimpaired individuals (age 77.4 ± 5.0, 61.5% female, Mini-Mental State Examination 29.1 ± 1.3) from the Harvard Aging Brain Study completed the self-administered Computerized Cognitive Composite (C3) monthly at home for up to 1 year (12.7 ± 3.2 C3 assessments). Baseline C3 assessment coincided with routine in-clinic visits, including amyloid and tau positron emission tomography imaging and standardized cognitive testing, with cognitive testing repeated annually (1.6 ± 1.2 years follow-up). The C3 includes two simple RT tasks and two complex RT tasks. IIV estimates were derived by computing intraindividual standard deviations on residual RT scores after regressing out age and session order effects. Cross-sectional associations of IIV with cognition (global cognition, memory, executive functions [EF], processing speed) and amyloid and tau burden were examined using linear regression analyses correcting for demographics and mean RT. The association between IIV and cognitive decline was assessed using linear mixed models correcting for demographic factors, mean RT, and amyloid burden. Results After adjusting for mean RT, increased IIV on complex RT tasks was independently associated with worse EF performance (β = -0.10, 95% CI [-.16, -0.03], p = .004), greater inferior-temporal tau deposition (β = 0.18, 95% CI [0.02, 0.34], p = .024), and faster cognitive decline in those with elevated amyloid (β = -0.62, 95% CI [-1.18, -0.06], p = .033). Conclusions Increased variability in monthly RT may reflect subtle EF deficits and provide unique information about short-term cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Jutten, R. J., Amariglio, R. E., Maruff, P., Properzi, M. J., Rentz, D. M., Johnson, K. A., et al. (2024). Increased intraindividual variability in reaction time performance is associated with emerging cognitive decline in cognitively unimpaired adults. Neuropsychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000928
Vancouver
Jutten RJ, Amariglio RE, Maruff P, Properzi MJ, Rentz DM, Johnson KA, et al. Increased intraindividual variability in reaction time performance is associated with emerging cognitive decline in cognitively unimpaired adults. Neuropsychology. 2024. doi:10.1037/neu0000928. PMID: 37971861.
BibTeX
@article{jutten2024-37971861,
author = {Jutten, R. J. and Amariglio, R. E. and Maruff, P. and Properzi, M. J. and Rentz, D. M. and Johnson, K. A. and Sperling, R. A. and Papp, K. V.},
title = {{Increased intraindividual variability in reaction time performance is associated with emerging cognitive decline in cognitively unimpaired adults}},
journal = {Neuropsychology},
year = {2024},
doi = {10.1037/neu0000928},
pmid = {37971861},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000928}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 8 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Results After adjusting for mean RT, increased IIV on complex RT tasks was independently associated with worse EF performance (β = -0.10, 95% CI [-.16, -0.03], p = .004), greater inferior-temporal tau deposition (β = 0.18, 95% CI [0.02, 0.34], p = .024), and faster cognitive decline in those with elevated amyloid (β = -0.62, 95% CI [-1.18, -0.06], p = .033).
Study details
- Study designcross-sectional
- Participants109
- Effect size61.5%
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 60/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a snapshot of people at one point in time. Scored zero for randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 35 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 60 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Neuropsychology) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 4 / 12 | A snapshot of people at one point in time |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 4 / 5 | 2024 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 2 / 4 | 109 participants |
| Effect reported | 2 / 3 | Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 37971861) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 35 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 35 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 60 out of 100. |
| Total | 60 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related studies in Cognitive tests and assessment
Also tagged “cognitively-unimpaired”
5 studies in the library carry the topic tag “cognitively-unimpaired”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 5 tagged studies.