Home › Research › Health systems and care delivery
Heterogeneous responses to risk-adjustment reform: evidence from dementia diagnosis in Medicare Advantage
Sidra Haye, Mireille Jacobson, Julie Zissimopoulos. Health Affairs Scholar, 2026-06-27
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
Incident dementia diagnoses increased in MA relative to traditional Medicare, despite an overall downward trend in diagnosis rates. Increases were larger among enrollees in MA health maintenance organization plans (20.8%) than in preferred provider organization plans (7.6%) and varied across insurers, ranging from 7.2% (United Healthcare) to 21.6% (Kaiser Permanente). Increases were more pronounced in urban than in rural areas. Reintroducing ADRD into the MA risk-adjustment model was associated with increased diagnostic coding, with substantial variation across plan types, insurers, and geographic contexts. Because ADRD diagnoses increase risk-adjusted payments, larger increases across some plans may reflect coding practices rather than true disease prevalence, highlighting the need for closer monitoring.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Haye, S., Jacobson, M., & Zissimopoulos, J. (2026). Heterogeneous responses to risk-adjustment reform: evidence from dementia diagnosis in Medicare Advantage. Health Affairs Scholar. https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxag167
Vancouver
Haye S, Jacobson M, Zissimopoulos J. Heterogeneous responses to risk-adjustment reform: evidence from dementia diagnosis in Medicare Advantage. Health Affairs Scholar. 2026. doi:10.1093/haschl/qxag167. PMID: 42516522.
BibTeX
@article{haye2026-42516522,
author = {Haye, Sidra and Jacobson, Mireille and Zissimopoulos, Julie},
title = {{Heterogeneous responses to risk-adjustment reform: evidence from dementia diagnosis in Medicare Advantage}},
journal = {Health Affairs Scholar},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.1093/haschl/qxag167},
pmid = {42516522},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxag167}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Incident dementia diagnoses increased in MA relative to traditional Medicare, despite an overall downward trend in diagnosis rates.
- Increases were larger among enrollees in MA health maintenance organization plans (20.8%) than in preferred provider organization plans (7.6%) and varied across insurers, ranging from 7.2% (United Healthcare) to 21.6% (Kaiser Permanente).
- Increases were more pronounced in urban than in rural areas.
- Reintroducing ADRD into the MA risk-adjustment model was associated with increased diagnostic coding, with substantial variation across plan types, insurers, and geographic contexts.
- Because ADRD diagnoses increase risk-adjusted payments, larger increases across some plans may reflect coding practices rather than true disease prevalence, highlighting the need for closer monitoring.
Why it matters
This study found that new dementia diagnoses in Medicare Advantage increased after Alzheimer's disease and related dementias were reintroduced into the risk adjustment model, with variation across plan types and insurers. It notes that larger increases may reflect coding practices rather than true disease prevalence, and it is not about treating, curing, or preventing Alzheimer's disease.
Study details
- Effect size20.8%; 7.6%; 7.2%
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 32/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 31 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 32 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Health Affairs Scholar) |
| Journal's citation record | 0 / 4 | Health Affairs Scholar: journal h-index 21 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 5 / 5 | 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 2 / 3 | Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | 0 / 7 | Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 0 / 5 | 0.0 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026 |
| Impact for its field and year | 0 / 6 | Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 0 / 6 | No other study in this library cites it |
| Still being cited | 0 / 4 | Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Julie Zissimopoulos holds only 5 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | 2 / 3 | University of Southern California: institution h-index 1,521 (OpenAlex) |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 0 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete) |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 42516522) |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Points | 31 / 96 | Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 31 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 32 out of 100. |
| Total | 32 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
- DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxag167
- PubMed: 42516522
- Original source →
- Free full text: Health Affairs Scholar →
Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).
Studies this one cites
Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.
Related studies in Health systems and care delivery
Also tagged “prevalence”
1,224 studies in the library carry the topic tag “prevalence”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,224 tagged studies.