Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 40 out of 100. Health systems and care delivery

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

ABSTRACT Objective To examine whether Medicare Advantage (MA) plans affiliated with health systems adopt less restrictive prior authorization (PA) policies than non‐affiliated plans. Study Setting and Design We conducted a descriptive analysis comparing PA policies between system‐affiliated and unaffiliated MA plans from 2016 to 2023. Using Plan Benefit Package data, we constructed enrollment‐weighted measures of PA intensity based on the share of service categories requiring PA. We assessed robustness using alternative measures, including service‐specific PA requirements, service mix‐adjusted overall intensity, and measures without enrollment weights, and also examined results by plan type. Data Sources and Analytic Sample Analyses included 6480 MA health maintenance organization and preferred provider organization plans operating during the study period. Principal Findings Enrollees in system‐affiliated MA plans faced fewer PA requirements than those in unaffiliated plans. In 2023, the difference was 31 percentage points (pp): among 23 service categories, enrollees in affiliated plans were enrolled in plans that required PA for 51% of categories, compared with 82% in unaffiliated plans. Differences were especially pronounced for behavioral and mental health services and dialysis (52–59 pp). Conclusions System affiliation is associated with less restrictive PA policies in MA, highlighting organizational structure as an important dimension of utilization management.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Shin, E. (2026). Health System Integration and Prior Authorization in Medicare Advantage. Health Services Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70137

Vancouver

Shin E. Health System Integration and Prior Authorization in Medicare Advantage. Health Services Research. 2026. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.70137.

BibTeX

@article{shin2026-adeb37ac,
  author  = {Shin, Eunhae},
  title   = {{Health System Integration and Prior Authorization in Medicare Advantage}},
  journal = {Health Services Research},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1111/1475-6773.70137},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70137}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This analysis found that Medicare Advantage plans affiliated with health systems required prior authorization for fewer service categories than unaffiliated plans. It contains no research findings on treating, curing, or preventing Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 40/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 40 of 100.40 of 100 points earned60 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Health Services Research)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Health Services Research: journal h-index 166 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 6,480 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 2 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.0 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 14.8× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 2 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Eunhae Shin: h-index 5 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 University of Georgia: institution h-index 904 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 40 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Health systems and care delivery

Also in Health systems and care delivery

172 studies in the library are filed under Health systems and care delivery with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Health systems and care delivery hub.

Similar studies

More on Health systems and care delivery

See all studies in Health systems and care delivery →