Home › Research › Down syndrome and Alzheimer's
Functional connectivity differences in the default mode and frontoparietal networks in older adults with Down syndrome are related to obstructive sleep apnea
Lisa M. Taylor, Jenna N. Adams, Natalie D. DiProspero, Liv C. McMillan, Mithra T. Sathishkumar, Eric W. Doran, Florence Y. Lai, H. Diana Rosas et al.. Alzheimer s & Dementia, 2025-12-01
Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models
Abstract Background There is disrupted functional connectivity (FC) of the default mode network (DMN) and frontoparietal network (FPN) in adults with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). DMN FC is also particularly sensitive to disruption in Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, there is limited research investigating if OSA affects FC in Down syndrome (DS), despite the prevalence of both OSA and AD pathology within this population. We examined if DMN and FPN FC are also disrupted in older adults with DS and OSA, and whether this is dependent on concurrent cognitive impairment due to AD. Method Seventy‐five participants from the Alzheimer Biomarkers Consortium – Down syndrome (ABC‐DS) study (age 49.93+6.6) underwent resting‐state functional MRI. For our seed‐based connectivity approach, data were harmonized and processed using the CONN Toolbox with the default MNI preprocessing pipeline. FC strength was calculated (1) between regions‐of‐interest (ROIs) within each network (“within‐network FC”) and (2) between ROIs in each network and all other ROIs outside of the network (“between‐network FC”). Group differences in FC were assessed based on self‐reported OSA and consensus diagnosis of cognitive status – cognitively stable (CS) or cognitively impaired (CI; mild cognitive impairment or dementia). Result There was a significant interaction between OSA and diagnosis for within‐ and between‐DMN FC ( p ‐values<0.05). The CS‐OSA group had higher FC than the CI‐OSA group. There was also a trend showing higher FC in CS‐OSA compared to CS‐nonOSA. For within‐ and between‐FPN FC, the same groups differences were observed, though the interaction was trending ( p ‐values<0.10). FC did not differ between CS and CI individuals without OSA, nor between CI groups with and without OSA. Conclusion We observed higher within‐ and between‐DMN FC in the CS‐OSA compared to the CI‐OSA group; however, this difference was not observed between the CS‐nonOSA and CI‐nonOSA groups. This result suggests a unique FC signature for individuals with DS and OSA prior to AD‐related cognitive impairment. These findings suggest that there's a unique FC signature for individuals with DS and OSA such that FC is initially elevated prior to AD‐related cognitive impairment then is reduced following AD symptom onset.
Key findings
- Result There was a significant interaction between OSA and diagnosis for within‐ and between‐DMN FC ( p ‐values<0.05).
- There was also a trend showing higher FC in CS‐OSA compared to CS‐nonOSA.
- Conclusion We observed higher within‐ and between‐DMN FC in the CS‐OSA compared to the CI‐OSA group; however, this difference was not observed between the CS‐nonOSA and CI‐nonOSA groups.
- This result suggests a unique FC signature for individuals with DS and OSA prior to AD‐related cognitive impairment.
- These findings suggest that there's a unique FC signature for individuals with DS and OSA such that FC is initially elevated prior to AD‐related cognitive impairment then is reduced following AD symptom onset.
Why it matters
Brain scans of seventy-five older adults with Down syndrome from the ABC-DS study showed that sleep apnea interacted with cognitive status in shaping how strongly key brain networks communicate. Among people with sleep apnea, those who were still cognitively stable had higher connectivity in the default mode network than those with cognitive impairment, a gap not seen in people without sleep apnea. The authors suggest connectivity may first rise and then fall as Alzheimer's symptoms begin in people with Down syndrome and sleep apnea.
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 35/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Alzheimer s & Dementia) |
| Journal's citation record | 2 / 4 | Alzheimer s & Dementia: journal h-index 228 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 4 / 5 | 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | 0 / 7 | Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 0 / 5 | 0.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025 |
| Impact for its field and year | 0 / 6 | Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 0 / 6 | No other study in this library cites it |
| Still being cited | 0 / 4 | Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | 3 / 4 | Last-listed author Michael A. Yassa: h-index 52 (OpenAlex, whole career) |
| Institution's track record | 3 / 3 | Harvard University: institution h-index 3,235 (OpenAlex) |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 2 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 1 country |
| Indexed in PubMed | 1 / 2 | Not in PubMed, but has a DOI |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Total | 35 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Taylor, L. M., Adams, J. N., DiProspero, N. D., McMillan, L. C., Sathishkumar, M. T., Doran, E. W., et al. (2025). Functional connectivity differences in the default mode and frontoparietal networks in older adults with Down syndrome are related to obstructive sleep apnea. Alzheimer s & Dementia. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70856_105803
Vancouver
Taylor LM, Adams JN, DiProspero ND, McMillan LC, Sathishkumar MT, Doran EW, et al. Functional connectivity differences in the default mode and frontoparietal networks in older adults with Down syndrome are related to obstructive sleep apnea. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 2025. doi:10.1002/alz70856_105803.
BibTeX
@article{taylor2025-ac6f6260,
author = {Taylor, Lisa M. and Adams, Jenna N. and DiProspero, Natalie D. and McMillan, Liv C. and Sathishkumar, Mithra T. and Doran, Eric W. and Lai, Florence Y. and Rosas, H. Diana and others},
title = {{Functional connectivity differences in the default mode and frontoparietal networks in older adults with Down syndrome are related to obstructive sleep apnea}},
journal = {Alzheimer s \& Dementia},
year = {2025},
doi = {10.1002/alz70856_105803},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70856_105803}
}
Related studies in Down syndrome and Alzheimer's
Also tagged “down”
527 studies in the library carry the topic tag “down”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 527 tagged studies.