Home › Research › Prevention trials
From Dementia to Eumentia: A New Approach to Dementia Prevention
Vladimir Hachinski, Abolfazl Avan. Neuroepidemiology, 2022-05-25
Topic: Brain imaging, connectivity and assessment
Since environmental, socioeconomic, and individual risk factors contribute to dementia, we proposed a Comprehensive, Customized, Cost-effective APProach (the CCC-APP) implemented in actionable units with the focus on promoting brain health (eumentia). KEY MESSAGES: We should implement dementia prevention approaches in actionable units around optimal brain health or eumentia. Heart disease, stroke, and dementia share mostly the same risk and protective factors; thus, their joint prevention is desirable. We need a comprehensive, customized, and cost-effective approach to joint prevention of stroke, heart disease, and dementia. We call for literal and virtual meetings of researchers of all the relevant disciplines to work on operational definitions and interdisciplinary collaborations.
Key findings
- Since environmental, socioeconomic, and individual risk factors contribute to dementia, we proposed a Comprehensive, Customized, Cost-effective APProach (the CCC-APP) implemented in actionable units with the focus on promoting brain health (eumentia).
- KEY MESSAGES: We should implement dementia prevention approaches in actionable units around optimal brain health or eumentia.
- Heart disease, stroke, and dementia share mostly the same risk and protective factors; thus, their joint prevention is desirable.
- We need a comprehensive, customized, and cost-effective approach to joint prevention of stroke, heart disease, and dementia.
- We call for literal and virtual meetings of researchers of all the relevant disciplines to work on operational definitions and interdisciplinary collaborations.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Prevention →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 41/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 23 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 41 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Neuroepidemiology) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 3 / 5 | 2022 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 35613542) |
| Free to read | — / 2 | Access not recorded — left out of this score |
| Points | 23 / 56 | Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 23 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 41 out of 100. |
| Total | 41 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Hachinski, V., & Avan, A. (2022). From Dementia to Eumentia: A New Approach to Dementia Prevention. Neuroepidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1159/000525219
Vancouver
Hachinski V, Avan A. From Dementia to Eumentia: A New Approach to Dementia Prevention. Neuroepidemiology. 2022. doi:10.1159/000525219. PMID: 35613542.
BibTeX
@article{hachinski2022-35613542,
author = {Hachinski, Vladimir and Avan, Abolfazl},
title = {{From Dementia to Eumentia: A New Approach to Dementia Prevention}},
journal = {Neuroepidemiology},
year = {2022},
doi = {10.1159/000525219},
pmid = {35613542},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1159/000525219}
}