Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 34 out of 100. Cognitive tests and assessment

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

Objective To characterize abnormal functional connectivity in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and its association with cognitive impairment using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI). Methods Sixty-eight DLB patients and 38 age-, sex-, and education-matched healthy controls underwent neuropsychological assessments (MoCA, MMSE) and rs-fMRI. Imaging analyses included seed-based functional connectivity (sFC), independent component analysis (ICA), regional homogeneity (ReHo), fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFF), and graph-theoretical network metrics (small-worldness, global/local efficiency). Results DLB patients exhibited significantly reduced FC in the default mode network (DMN) and visual network, including PCC–AG ( P < 0.001) and PCC–mPFC ( P < 0.001). ReHo and fALFF indicated decreased local neural synchronization and low-frequency activity in the posterior occipital lobe (fALFF: P = 0.004), angular gyrus (fALFF: P = 0.001), left temporal pole (fALFF: P < 0.001), left parietal (ReHo: P < 0.001), and posterior cerebellar lobe (ReHo: P < 0.001). Graph theory revealed impaired global network topology in DLB, with decreased small-worldness ( P < 0.001) and global efficiency ( P < 0.001). PCC–AG connectivity positively correlated with the MoCA total score ( r = 0.53, P < 0.001), attention ( r = 0.46, P < 0.001), executive ( r = 0.41, P < 0.001), and language function ( r = 0.34, P < 0.001). Posterior occipital fALFF and left parietal ReHo showed significant positive correlations with multiple cognitive domains, including visuospatial ability ( r = 0.34, P < 0.001 for fALFF; r = 0.42, P < 0.001 for ReHo) and memory ( r = 0.45, P < 0.001 for fALFF; r = 0.27, P = 0.006 for ReHo). A combined model of PCC–AG connectivity, fALFF, and small-worldness predicted 42% of MoCA variance ( R 2 = 0.42, P < 0.001). Conclusion DLB is characterized by DMN and visual network dysfunction, disrupted local neural activity, and impaired global network integration. These rs-fMRI metrics may serve as potential biomarkers for cognitive deficits in DLB.

Key findings

Why it matters

In dementia with Lewy bodies, brain imaging showed reduced connectivity in the default mode and visual networks and impaired global network organization, which correlated with cognitive test scores. This helps explain how brain network changes relate to cognitive deficits, but it is not a treatment or cure.

Study details

How this study scored 34/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 33 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 34 of 100. Total 34 of 100.33 of the 96 points we could judge = 34 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 33 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 34 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience: journal h-index 174 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 2 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.7 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.1× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 2 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Jiyu Ji holds only 4 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record 1 / 3 University of Bristol: institution h-index 1,260 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41346435)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 33 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 33 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 34 out of 100.
Total 34 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Zhou, S., Liu, M., Kuai, J., Yi, T., Zheng, Y., Bao, X., et al. (2025). Dysfunctional default mode and visual networks underlie cognitive deficits in dementia with Lewy bodies: a resting-state fMRI study. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2025.1630826

Vancouver

Zhou S, Liu M, Kuai J, Yi T, Zheng Y, Bao X, et al. Dysfunctional default mode and visual networks underlie cognitive deficits in dementia with Lewy bodies: a resting-state fMRI study. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 2025. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2025.1630826. PMID: 41346435.

BibTeX

@article{zhou2025-41346435,
  author  = {Zhou, Su and Liu, Mengran and Kuai, Jun and Yi, Tingting and Zheng, Yuechang and Bao, Xinran and Ji, Jiyu},
  title   = {{Dysfunctional default mode and visual networks underlie cognitive deficits in dementia with Lewy bodies: a resting-state fMRI study}},
  journal = {Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.3389/fnagi.2025.1630826},
  pmid    = {41346435},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2025.1630826}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Cognitive tests and assessment

Similar studies

More on Cognitive tests and assessment

See all studies in Cognitive tests and assessment →