Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 44 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Abstract Background The COVID‐19 pandemic has disproportionately affected ethno‐racial minority populations and people with greater social deprivation. It is unknown whether such disparities influence research participation for investigations of long‐term neuro‐cognitive effects of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Method Across 3 US and 1 UK sites, we are enrolling a multi‐racial cohort of SARS‐CoV‐2 infected individuals and age, sex, race‐matched non‐infected controls. Utilizing harmonized protocols for cognitive assessments and 7‐Tesla MRI, we aim to provide ultra‐high‐field data on natural history of COVID‐19 driven microstructural and microvascular cerebral changes and associated cognitive trajectories. We will also compare the imaging markers to those observed in an existing cohort of early onset Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD). We analyzed screening and enrollment data to determine potential age, sex, race, ethnicity, and social deprivation disparities in research participation. We derived address‐based Area Deprivation Index (ADI) (scale 1 ‐10), with higher ADI indicating greater deprivation. Logistic regression models were fit to evaluate associates of non‐response and refusal. Odds Ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are reported. Result Over a 11‐month period, at a single US site, a total of 1,046 SARS‐CoV‐2 infected people and their controls were contacted, and 379 (36.2%) responded. In univariable analyses, non‐response was associated with younger age, male sex, non‐White race, and higher ADI (Table 1). In the fully adjusted model, non‐White race was independently associated with higher likelihood of non‐response [OR (CI) for Black vs. White: 1.49 (1.04, 2.12) and for Asian vs. White: 1.88 (1.28, 2.76)]., Independent of race, higher ADI was also associated with likelihood of non‐response (Table 2 and Figure 1). Among the responders, 228 (60.2%) refused. Although, no socio‐demographic factors were significantly associated with likelihood of refusal, the point estimates in the fully adjusted model suggest potential racial disparities in providing consent (Tables 1 and 2). Aggregated data from all sites will be presented. Conclusion It is imperative to recognize and mitigate persistent disparities in the COVID‐19 pandemic, particularly pertaining to participation in long‐COVID research. Mechanisms of such persistent disparities need to be studied in context of cultures, beliefs, access, and clinical factors.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study analyzed screening and enrollment data from a multi-racial SARS-CoV-2 cohort being evaluated with 7-Tesla MRI and cognitive assessments for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. It found that non-White race and higher Area Deprivation Index were independently associated with higher likelihood of non-response to research participation.

Study details

How this study scored 44/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 44 of 100.44 of 100 points earned56 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Alzheimer s & Dementia)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Alzheimer s & Dementia: journal h-index 228 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2023 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 1,046 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 5 year(s) since 2023
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author Sudha S. Seshadri: h-index 148 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 Massachusetts General Hospital: institution h-index 2,057 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 8 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 44 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Vahidy, F., Hosseini, A. A., Girard, T. D., Ibrahim, T. S., Jacobs, H. I., Román, G. C., et al. (2023). Disparities in Research Participation within a Multi‐Racial SARS‐CoV‐2 Cohort for Evaluation of Ultrahigh Field (7T) MRI and Clinical Precursors of Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias. Alzheimer s & Dementia. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.077318

Vancouver

Vahidy F, Hosseini AA, Girard TD, Ibrahim TS, Jacobs HI, Román GC, et al. Disparities in Research Participation within a Multi‐Racial SARS‐CoV‐2 Cohort for Evaluation of Ultrahigh Field (7T) MRI and Clinical Precursors of Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 2023. doi:10.1002/alz.077318.

BibTeX

@article{vahidy2023-8cbc6a22,
  author  = {Vahidy, Farhaan and Hosseini, Akram A. and Girard, Timothy D. and Ibrahim, Tamer S. and Jacobs, Heidi I.L. and Román, Gustavo C. and Masdeu, Joseph C. and Li, Karl and others},
  title   = {{Disparities in Research Participation within a Multi‐Racial SARS‐CoV‐2 Cohort for Evaluation of Ultrahigh Field (7T) MRI and Clinical Precursors of Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias}},
  journal = {Alzheimer s \& Dementia},
  year    = {2023},
  doi     = {10.1002/alz.077318},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.077318}
}

Related studies in Risk factors

Also tagged “classification”

835 studies in the library carry the topic tag “classification”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 835 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →