Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 41 out of 100. Risk genes beyond APOE

Topic: Disease mechanisms in lab and animal studies

Autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease (ADAD) is a rare early-onset form of Alzheimer's disease, caused by dominant mutations in one of three genes: presenilin 1, presenilin 2, and amyloid β precursor protein (APP). Mutations in the presenilin 1 gene (PSEN1) account for the majority of cases, and individuals who inherit a single-mutant PSEN1 allele go on to develop early-onset dementia, ultimately leading to death. The presenilin 1 protein (PS1) is the catalytic subunit of the γ-secretase protease, a tetrameric protease responsible for cleavage of numerous transmembrane proteins, including Notch and the APP. Inclusion of a mutant PS1 subunit in the γ-secretase complex leads to a loss of enzyme function and a preferential reduction of shorter forms of Aβ peptides over longer forms, an established biomarker of ADAD progression in human patients. In this study, we describe the development of a gene therapy vector expressing a wild-type (WT) copy of human PSEN1 to ameliorate the loss of function associated with PSEN1 mutations. We have carried out studies in mouse models using a recombinant AAV9 vector to deliver the PSEN1 gene directly into the central nervous system (CNS) and shown that we can normalize γ-secretase function and slow neurodegeneration in both PSEN1 conditional knockout and PSEN1 mutant knockin models. We have also carried out biodistribution studies in nonhuman primates (NHPs) and demonstrated the ability to achieve broad PS1 protein expression throughout the cortex and the hippocampus, two regions known to be critically involved in ADAD progression. These studies demonstrate preclinical proof of concept that expression of a WT human PSEN1 gene in cells harboring a dominant PSEN1 mutation can correct the γ-secretase dysfunction. In addition, direct administration of the recombinant AAV9 into the NHP brain can achieve broad expression at levels predicted to provide efficacy in the clinic.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Moore, B., Sharma, A., Goulet, M., Suter, T., Pelletier, C., Hu, R., et al. (2023). Developing a Gene Therapy for the Treatment of Autosomal Dominant Alzheimer's Disease. Human gene therapy. https://doi.org/10.1089/hum.2023.092

Vancouver

Moore B, Sharma A, Goulet M, Suter T, Pelletier C, Hu R, et al. Developing a Gene Therapy for the Treatment of Autosomal Dominant Alzheimer's Disease. Human gene therapy. 2023. doi:10.1089/hum.2023.092. PMID: 37578141.

BibTeX

@article{moore2023-37578141,
  author  = {Moore, Benjamin and Sharma, Apurwa and Goulet, Martin and Suter, Tracey and Pelletier, Carolyn and Hu, Ruoxi and Schaeffer, Eric and Kelleher, Raymond J},
  title   = {{Developing a Gene Therapy for the Treatment of Autosomal Dominant Alzheimer's Disease}},
  journal = {Human gene therapy},
  year    = {2023},
  doi     = {10.1089/hum.2023.092},
  pmid    = {37578141},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1089/hum.2023.092}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 8 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 41/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 23 of the 56 points it could be judged on, which is 41 of 100. Total 41 of 100.23 of the 56 points we could judge = 41 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 23 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 41 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Human gene therapy)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2023 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 37578141)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 23 / 56 Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 23 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 41 out of 100.
Total 41 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Risk genes beyond APOE

Also tagged “presenilin”

344 studies in the library carry the topic tag “presenilin”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 344 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Risk genes beyond APOE

See all studies in Risk genes beyond APOE →