Home › Research › Costs and economics
Dementia and fragility fractures: Issues and solutions
James S H Vun, Milad Ahmadi, Michalis Panteli, Ippokratis Pountos, Peter V Giannoudis. Injury, 2017-08-26
Topic: Health services, long-term care and technology
Dementia and fragility fractures are two conditions that pose significant morbidity and mortality to the elderly population. The occurrence of the 'gerontic' boom as a result of improved healthcare meant a continued increase in the prevalence of fragility fractures and dementia. This represents a major public health problem with significant socioeconomic repercussions. It is therefore important for healthcare professionals to gain a better understanding on the relationship between these two commonly co-existing conditions. In this review, we present the available literature surrounding the relationship between fragility fractures and dementia, and the common challenges faced in the management of these two conditions. Combining evidence from the literature along with our current clinical practice, we propose a management pathway aimed at early diagnosis, prevention and management of these two often co-existing conditions. This alongside with a multidisciplinary approach will not only translate to improved patient outcomes and survivorship, but also reduced healthcare cost and socio-economic burden. To date, there is insufficient evidence from the literature to suggest whether dementia is the cause or effect for fragility fractures, or if indeed there is a bidirectional relationship between the two conditions. Further studies are required to shed light onto this important clinical topic.
Key findings
- Dementia and fragility fractures are two conditions that pose significant morbidity and mortality to the elderly population.
- The occurrence of the 'gerontic' boom as a result of improved healthcare meant a continued increase in the prevalence of fragility fractures and dementia.
- This represents a major public health problem with significant socioeconomic repercussions.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Costs & economics →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 39/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 22 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 39 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Injury) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 2 / 5 | 2017 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 28851522) |
| Free to read | — / 2 | Access not recorded — left out of this score |
| Points | 22 / 56 | Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 22 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 39 out of 100. |
| Total | 39 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Vun, J. S. H., Ahmadi, M., Panteli, M., Pountos, I., & Giannoudis, P. V. (2017). Dementia and fragility fractures: Issues and solutions. Injury. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.031
Vancouver
Vun JSH, Ahmadi M, Panteli M, Pountos I, Giannoudis PV. Dementia and fragility fractures: Issues and solutions. Injury. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.031. PMID: 28851522.
BibTeX
@article{vun2017-28851522,
author = {Vun, James S H and Ahmadi, Milad and Panteli, Michalis and Pountos, Ippokratis and Giannoudis, Peter V},
title = {{Dementia and fragility fractures: Issues and solutions}},
journal = {Injury},
year = {2017},
doi = {10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.031},
pmid = {28851522},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.031}
}
Related studies in Costs and economics
Also tagged “costs”
265 studies in the library carry the topic tag “costs”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 265 tagged studies.