Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 33 out of 100. Genetics

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

The APOE (apolipoprotein E) ε4 allele is the strongest known genetic risk factor for sporadic Alzheimer disease (AD) and for brain amyloidosis, an early marker of disease pathophysiology. However, APOE ε4 is present in only 25% of the general population and is by itself inadequate for explaining susceptibility to amyloid accumulation or AD diagnosis. Existing studies have been limited by potential confounding due to inclusion of individuals carrying APOE ε4 or ε2 (which has a modest protective association). We hypothesized that genome-wide association study (GWAS) and genetic risk score (GRS) analyses in APOE ε3/ε3 individuals would uniquely identify novel predictors of β-amyloid pathology in older adults.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Ramanan, V. K., Heckman, M. G., Hofrenning, E. I., Przybelski, S. A., Graff‐Radford, J., Lowe, V. J., et al. (2025). Combating Genetic Heterogeneity for Polygenic Prediction of Susceptibility to Brain β-Amyloid Deposition. Neurology Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1212/nxg.0000000000200266

Vancouver

Ramanan VK, Heckman MG, Hofrenning EI, Przybelski SA, Graff‐Radford J, Lowe VJ, et al. Combating Genetic Heterogeneity for Polygenic Prediction of Susceptibility to Brain β-Amyloid Deposition. Neurology Genetics. 2025. doi:10.1212/nxg.0000000000200266. PMID: 40703204.

BibTeX

@article{ramanan2025-40703204,
  author  = {Ramanan, Vijay K. and Heckman, Michael G. and Hofrenning, Ekaterina I. and Przybelski, Scott A. and Graff‐Radford, Jonathan and Lowe, Val J. and Machulda, Mary M. and Murray, Melissa Erin and others},
  title   = {{Combating Genetic Heterogeneity for Polygenic Prediction of Susceptibility to Brain β-Amyloid Deposition}},
  journal = {Neurology Genetics},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1212/nxg.0000000000200266},
  pmid    = {40703204},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1212/nxg.0000000000200266}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study proposes that studying people who carry only the APOE ε3 form of the gene may reveal new genetic predictors of brain amyloid buildup. It has not yet reported any new predictors; it describes the rationale for a planned analysis.

Study details

How this study scored 33/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 32 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 33 of 100. Total 33 of 100.32 of the 96 points we could judge = 33 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 32 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 33 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Neurology Genetics)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Neurology Genetics: journal h-index 53 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 2 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.7 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.1× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 2 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record 2 / 3 Mayo Clinic: institution h-index 1,606 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40703204)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 32 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 32 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 33 out of 100.
Total 33 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 13.

Related studies in Genetics

Also tagged “precursor”

1,339 studies in the library carry the topic tag “precursor”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,339 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Genetics

See all studies in Genetics →