Home › Research › Treatments
Cholinesterase inhibitors and beyond
Giancarlo Pepeu, Maria Grazia Giovannini. Current Alzheimer research, 2009-04
Topic: Drug trials: efficacy and safety
Cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) were introduced in the therapy of Alzheimer Disease (AD) in the nineteen nineties with great expectations. The hopes and large interest raised by these drugs are well demonstrated by 12,000 references listed by PubMed under 'ChEI' for 1995-2007. The list is reduced to 2500 if we confine ourselves to 'ChEIs and dementia'. Of them, about 500 were published in the last two years. Whereas an increase in brain acetylcholine and an improvement of cognitive deficits have been consistently demonstrated in animal models of AD, from aging rats to transgenic mice, the clinical effectiveness of ChEIs has been and is still a matter of contrasting opinions. These range from the negative conclusions of the AD2000 trial on donepezil, claiming that it is not cost effective, with benefits below a minimally relevant threshold, to the NICE appraisal of 2007 declaring that donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine are efficacious for mild to moderate AD, irrespective of their different selectivity for acetyl- (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE). The possibility that ChEIs may exert their effects through mechanisms beyond cholinesterase inhibition has been envisaged. However, according to the information presented in this review, the "classical" ChEIs, donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine, show no pharmacological actions beyond cholinesterase inhibition which may play an important role in their therapeutic efficacy. The diverging opinions on clinical efficacy do not discourage from developing new ChEIs, and particularly the so called multifunctional ChEIs. They represent the future of the cholinergic therapy for AD but other indications for these drugs may be considered, including vascular dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and the ethically sensitive improvement of memory and learning in healthy subjects.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Pepeu, G., & Giovannini, M. G. (2009). Cholinesterase inhibitors and beyond. Current Alzheimer research. https://doi.org/10.2174/156720509787602861
Vancouver
Pepeu G, Giovannini MG. Cholinesterase inhibitors and beyond. Current Alzheimer research. 2009. doi:10.2174/156720509787602861. PMID: 19355843.
BibTeX
@article{pepeu2009-19355843,
author = {Pepeu, Giancarlo and Giovannini, Maria Grazia},
title = {{Cholinesterase inhibitors and beyond}},
journal = {Current Alzheimer research},
year = {2009},
doi = {10.2174/156720509787602861},
pmid = {19355843},
url = {https://doi.org/10.2174/156720509787602861}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- The hopes and large interest raised by these drugs are well demonstrated by 12,000 references listed by PubMed under 'ChEI' for 1995-2007.
- Whereas an increase in brain acetylcholine and an improvement of cognitive deficits have been consistently demonstrated in animal models of AD, from aging rats to transgenic mice, the clinical effectiveness of ChEIs has been and is still a matter of contrasting opinions.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Treatments →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 38/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 21 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 38 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Current Alzheimer research) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 2009 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 19355843) |
| Free to read | — / 2 | Access not recorded — left out of this score |
| Points | 21 / 56 | Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 21 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 38 out of 100. |
| Total | 38 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related studies in Treatments
Also tagged “acetylcholinesterase”
234 studies in the library carry the topic tag “acetylcholinesterase”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 234 tagged studies.