Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 48 out of 100. Costs and economics

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Objectives To examine a 12-month dementia care management program's effect on health care cost, utilization, and overall return on investment in a Medicare managed care population. Study design Pre-post analysis of participants (n = 121) enrolled in Ochsner's Care Ecosystem program from 2019 through 2021 compared with propensity-matched controls (n = 121). The primary outcome comparison was total cost of care. Secondary outcomes included components of total cost of care (eg, inpatient, outpatient, emergency department [ED] costs), health care utilization (eg, number of ED visits), and differences in Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) risk scores. Methods Difference-in-differences analyses were conducted from baseline through 12 months comparing various financial metrics and utilization between groups. Results Care Ecosystem participants had significantly lower total cost of care at 12 months, mean savings of $475.80 per member per month compared with controls. Care Ecosystem participants had fewer ED, outpatient, and professional visits. HCC risk scores were also better relative to matched controls. Conclusions A collaborative dementia care program demonstrated significant financial benefit in a managed Medicare population.

Key findings

Why it matters

In this pre-post analysis of 121 participants in a dementia care management program compared with 121 propensity-matched controls, participants had significantly lower total cost of care at 12 months, with mean savings of $475.80 per member per month, and fewer emergency department, outpatient, and professional visits. This shows a financial benefit of a collaborative dementia care program, not a treatment that cures or prevents Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 48/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 2 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 0 of 4; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 46 of the 95 points it could be judged on, which is 48 of 100. Total 48 of 100.46 of the 95 points we could judge = 48 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a cohort study following people over time. Scored zero for randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on institution's track record and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 46 of the 95 points we could judge it on, which is 48 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (American Journal of Managed Care)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 The American Journal of Managed Care: journal h-index 38 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A cohort study following people over time
Strength of evidence 2 / 5 Rated “early” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2024 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 242 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 7 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.8 citations a year over 4 year(s) since 2024
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.9× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 7 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 0 / 4 Last-listed author Emily E. Brickell: h-index 2 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 0 institution(s) in 0 countries — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 39146484)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 46 / 95 Scored on 18 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 46 of the 95 points we could judge it on is 48 out of 100.
Total 48 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 10 Oct 2026), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Sawyer, R. J., Pereira Osorio, C., Sharma, S., & Brickell, E. (2024). Care management improves total cost of care for patients with dementia. American Journal of Managed Care. https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89559

Vancouver

Sawyer RJ, Pereira Osorio C, Sharma S, Brickell E. Care management improves total cost of care for patients with dementia. American Journal of Managed Care. 2024. doi:10.37765/ajmc.2024.89559. PMID: 39146484.

BibTeX

@article{sawyer2024-39146484,
  author  = {Sawyer, R. J. and Pereira Osorio, C. and Sharma, S. and Brickell, E.},
  title   = {{Care management improves total cost of care for patients with dementia}},
  journal = {American Journal of Managed Care},
  year    = {2024},
  doi     = {10.37765/ajmc.2024.89559},
  pmid    = {39146484},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89559}
}

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Costs and economics

Also tagged “care”

996 studies in the library carry the topic tag “care”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 996 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Costs and economics

See all studies in Costs and economics →