Home › Research › Digital health tools
Atypical presentation of progressive supranuclear palsy
Patricia H. Davis, C. Bergeron, Donald R. Crapper McLachlan. Annals of Neurology, 1985-04-01
Topic: Brain imaging, connectivity and assessment
Four pathologically documented cases of progressive supranuclear palsy are reported. Two patients exhibited severe dementia and 2 parkinsonism; none had the classic ophthalmoplegia. On retrospective analysis, clues to the diagnosis included early prominent gait disturbance, apraxia of eyelid opening in 1 patient, lack of tremor, poor response to levodopa-carbidopa, and severe rigidity with a posture of neck extension terminally in 1 patient. The clinical presentation of progressive supranuclear palsy, therefore, is not as stereotyped as previously thought, and the diagnosis can be overlooked if one adheres rigidly to the classic diagnostic criteria.
Key findings
- Four pathologically documented cases of progressive supranuclear palsy are reported.
- Two patients exhibited severe dementia and 2 parkinsonism; none had the classic ophthalmoplegia.
- On retrospective analysis, clues to the diagnosis included early prominent gait disturbance, apraxia of eyelid opening in 1 patient, lack of tremor, poor response to levodopa-carbidopa, and severe rigidity with a posture of neck extension terminally in 1 patient.
- The clinical presentation of progressive supranuclear palsy, therefore, is not as stereotyped as previously thought, and the diagnosis can be overlooked if one adheres rigidly to the classic diagnostic criteria.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Digital health →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 40/100
Published in a leading specialty journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 23 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 40 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 9 / 10 | Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Annals of Neurology) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 1985 — older than 20 years, still counted |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 4004154) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 23 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 23 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 40 out of 100. |
| Total | 40 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Davis, P. H., Bergeron, C., & McLachlan, D. R. C. (1985). Atypical presentation of progressive supranuclear palsy. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410170406
Vancouver
Davis PH, Bergeron C, McLachlan DRC. Atypical presentation of progressive supranuclear palsy. Annals of Neurology. 1985. doi:10.1002/ana.410170406. PMID: 4004154.
BibTeX
@article{davis1985-4004154,
author = {Davis, Patricia H. and Bergeron, C. and McLachlan, Donald R. Crapper},
title = {{Atypical presentation of progressive supranuclear palsy}},
journal = {Annals of Neurology},
year = {1985},
doi = {10.1002/ana.410170406},
pmid = {4004154},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410170406}
}