Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 30 out of 100. Vascular contributions

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

White matter hyperintensities (WMHs) are a common finding on magnetic resonance (MR) images in older individuals, appearing as high-signal intensity regions on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging. People with high WMH volume are at increased risk for dementia and stroke, controlling for vascular risk factors, but WMH burden is not reliably assessed in clinical practice. Manual segmentation of WMHs is accepted as the gold standard (or ground truth), however, it is a laborious and time-consuming method. Newer machine learning (ML)-based approaches are being proposed as alternatives to manual segmentation. Among these approaches, U-Net convolutional neural networks have demonstrated good WMH segmentation performance. However, even state-of-the-art ML models sometimes fail to correctly identify WMHs and their boundaries with sufficient accuracy. Attention blocks have emerged as a potential solution for improving the performance of U-Net models by enhancing the ability of the model to focus on relevant features in the data. We investigated the effectiveness of attention blocks in U-Net models for WMH segmentation compared to three other models (U-Net++, U-Net3+, and a standard U-Net). Attention blocks significantly improved the F-measure score for WMH segmentation (0.811 vs 0.789 for next best model, p=0.04) in a diverse brain imaging dataset. This study demonstrates that attention blocks enhance U-Net models used for WMH identification and classification.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study tested a machine learning method for measuring white matter hyperintensities, a marker linked to higher dementia and stroke risk, and found that adding attention blocks improved segmentation accuracy. Better measurement tools may help research and clinical assessment of this risk marker, but the study does not test any treatment or prevention for Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 30/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 1 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 30 of 100.30 of 100 points earned70 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (IEEE Latin America Transactions)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 IEEE Latin America Transactions: journal h-index 46 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 1 / 6 Cited 0.4× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Richard Frayne: h-index 50 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 University of Alberta: institution h-index 1,174 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 30 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Duarte, K. T. N., de Barros, M. C., Sidhu, A. S., Gobbi, D. G., McCreary, C. R., Saad, F., et al. (2025). Attention Blocks Improve White Matter Hyperintensity Semantic Segmentation using U-Nets. IEEE Latin America Transactions. https://doi.org/10.1109/tla.2025.11072499

Vancouver

Duarte KTN, de Barros MC, Sidhu AS, Gobbi DG, McCreary CR, Saad F, et al. Attention Blocks Improve White Matter Hyperintensity Semantic Segmentation using U-Nets. IEEE Latin America Transactions. 2025. doi:10.1109/tla.2025.11072499.

BibTeX

@article{duarte2025-e066ebde,
  author  = {Duarte, Kauê Tartarotti Nepomuceno and de Barros, Murilo Costa and Sidhu, Abhijot Singh and Gobbi, David G. and McCreary, Cheryl R. and Saad, Feryal and Camicioli, Richard M. and Smith, Eric Edward and others},
  title   = {{Attention Blocks Improve White Matter Hyperintensity Semantic Segmentation using U-Nets}},
  journal = {IEEE Latin America Transactions},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1109/tla.2025.11072499},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1109/tla.2025.11072499}
}

Related studies in Vascular contributions

Also tagged “cerebral”

900 studies in the library carry the topic tag “cerebral”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 900 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Vascular contributions

See all studies in Vascular contributions →