Home › Research › Cognitive tests and assessment
Assessment of Mild Cognitive Impairment Using CogEvo: A Computerized Cognitive Function Assessment Tool
Toru Satoh, Yoichi Sawada, Hideaki Saba, Hiroshi Kitamoto, Yoshiki Kato, Yoshiko Shiozuka, Tomoko Kuwada, Sayoko Shima et al.. Journal of primary care & community health, 2024
Topic: Brain imaging, connectivity and assessment
Both total CogEvo and MMSE scores significantly decreased with age. A significant positive correlation was observed between total CogEvo and MMSE scores, but a ceiling effect was detected in MMSE performance. Significant differences were observed in the total CogEvo score, including orientation and spatial cognitive function scores, among the 3 groups. CogEvo showed no educational bias. ROC analyses indicated moderate discrimination between the MMSE ≥ 28 group and the MMSE24-27 and MMSE ≤ 23 groups. The computer-administered CogEvo has the advantage of not exhibiting ceiling effects or educational bias like the MMSE, and was found to be able to detect age-related cognitive decline and impairment.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Satoh, T., Sawada, Y., Saba, H., Kitamoto, H., Kato, Y., Shiozuka, Y., et al. (2024). Assessment of Mild Cognitive Impairment Using CogEvo: A Computerized Cognitive Function Assessment Tool. Journal of primary care & community health. https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319241239228
Vancouver
Satoh T, Sawada Y, Saba H, Kitamoto H, Kato Y, Shiozuka Y, et al. Assessment of Mild Cognitive Impairment Using CogEvo: A Computerized Cognitive Function Assessment Tool. Journal of primary care & community health. 2024. doi:10.1177/21501319241239228. PMID: 38504559.
BibTeX
@article{satoh2024-38504559,
author = {Satoh, Toru and Sawada, Yoichi and Saba, Hideaki and Kitamoto, Hiroshi and Kato, Yoshiki and Shiozuka, Yoshiko and Kuwada, Tomoko and Shima, Sayoko and others},
title = {{Assessment of Mild Cognitive Impairment Using CogEvo: A Computerized Cognitive Function Assessment Tool}},
journal = {Journal of primary care \& community health},
year = {2024},
doi = {10.1177/21501319241239228},
pmid = {38504559},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319241239228}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Both total CogEvo and MMSE scores significantly decreased with age.
- A significant positive correlation was observed between total CogEvo and MMSE scores, but a ceiling effect was detected in MMSE performance.
- Significant differences were observed in the total CogEvo score, including orientation and spatial cognitive function scores, among the 3 groups.
- ROC analyses indicated moderate discrimination between the MMSE ≥ 28 group and the MMSE24-27 and MMSE ≤ 23 groups.
- The computer-administered CogEvo has the advantage of not exhibiting ceiling effects or educational bias like the MMSE, and was found to be able to detect age-related cognitive decline and impairment.
Study details
- Study designcross-sectional
- Participants209
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 59/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a snapshot of people at one point in time. Scored zero for effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 33 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 59 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of primary care & community health) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 4 / 12 | A snapshot of people at one point in time |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 4 / 5 | 2024 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 2 / 4 | 209 participants |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 38504559) |
| Free to read | — / 2 | Access not recorded — left out of this score |
| Points | 33 / 56 | Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 33 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 59 out of 100. |
| Total | 59 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related studies in Cognitive tests and assessment
Also tagged “computerized”
238 studies in the library carry the topic tag “computerized”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 238 tagged studies.