Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 47 out of 100. Down syndrome and Alzheimer's

Topic: Genetics and APOE

Trisomy of chromosome 21, the cause of Down syndrome (DS), is the most commonly occurring genetic cause of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Here, we compare the frontal cortex proteome of people with Down syndrome-Alzheimer’s disease (DSAD) to demographically matched cases of early-onset AD and healthy ageing controls. We find wide dysregulation of the proteome, beyond proteins encoded by chromosome 21, including an increase in the abundance of the key AD-associated protein, APOE, in people with DSAD compared to matched cases of AD. To understand the cell types that may contribute to changes in protein abundance, we undertook a matched single-nuclei RNA-sequencing study, which demonstrated that APOE expression was elevated in subtypes of astrocytes, endothelial cells and pericytes in DSAD. We further investigate how trisomy 21 may cause increased APOE. Increased abundance of APOE may impact the development of, or response to, AD pathology in the brain of people with DSAD, altering disease mechanisms with clinical implications. Overall, these data highlight that trisomy 21 alters both the transcriptome and proteome of people with DS in the context of AD, and that these differences should be considered when selecting therapeutic strategies for this vulnerable group of individuals who have high-risk of early-onset dementia.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Farrell, C., Buhidma, Y., Mumford, P., Heywood, W. E., Hällqvist, J., Flores-Aguilar, L., et al. (2025). Apolipoprotein E abundance is elevated in the brains of individuals with Down syndrome-Alzheimer’s disease. Acta neuropathologica. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.24.639862

Vancouver

Farrell C, Buhidma Y, Mumford P, Heywood WE, Hällqvist J, Flores-Aguilar L, et al. Apolipoprotein E abundance is elevated in the brains of individuals with Down syndrome-Alzheimer’s disease. Acta neuropathologica. 2025. doi:10.1101/2025.02.24.639862.

BibTeX

@article{farrell2025-39d43f22,
  author  = {Farrell, C. and Buhidma, Y. and Mumford, P. and Heywood, W. E. and Hällqvist, J. and Flores-Aguilar, L. and Andrews, E. and Rahimzadah, N. and others},
  title   = {{Apolipoprotein E abundance is elevated in the brains of individuals with Down syndrome-Alzheimer’s disease}},
  journal = {Acta neuropathologica},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1101/2025.02.24.639862},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.24.639862}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 47/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 27 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 47 of 100. Total 47 of 100.27 of the 58 points we could judge = 47 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 27 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 47 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Acta neuropathologica)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 27 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 27 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 47 out of 100.
Total 47 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Related studies in Down syndrome and Alzheimer's

Also tagged “apoe2”

265 studies in the library carry the topic tag “apoe2”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 265 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Down syndrome and Alzheimer's

See all studies in Down syndrome and Alzheimer's →