Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 39 out of 100. Prevention and risk

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Digital transformation in banking has significantly improved efficiency, including in the critical Letter of Credit (LC) examination area. Despite these advancements, LC examination remains complex, labor-intensive, and error-prone, leading to operational risks and inefficiencies. Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) offers a promising solution but requires human checkers to verify AI-generated decisions, ensuring accuracy and compliance. Assigning these verification tasks is essential to fully capitalize on AI’s potential, balancing time savings with risk reduction. This paper explores the underexamined challenge of optimizing the hybrid process of AI-assisted LC examination to enhance trade finance. The research aims to minimize examination risk and maximize checker capacity utilization by offering practical strategies for improvement. Through data-driven research collaboration with international banks and FinTech companies and benchmarking relevant literature, an Integer Linear Programming model was developed to assign review tasks for LC documents indexed by AI based on their criticality and discrepancies to human checkers. The model also considers monetary value, checker expertise, and availability factors. Real case studies evaluated improvements over baseline practices, objectives prioritization, trade-off analysis, and varying supply–demand scenarios. The model achieved a 68.3% reduction in operational risks, improving compliance and trustworthiness while minimizing errors and financial losses. Utilization rates ranged from 34% for risk-focused strategies to 73% for efficiency-driven approaches, providing flexibility for resource allocation aligned with organizational priorities. Using the proposed AI-optimization framework and results, the study offers actionable insights for managers and guidance for researchers. • Propose an integrated artificial intelligence and optimization framework for letter of credit examination. • Develop an integer linear programming model to enhance efficiency and reduce risks through dual objectives. • Use real-world data to evaluate improvements, objectives trade-offs, and supply–demand sensitivity. • Achieve 68.3% risk reduction while ensuring high utilization and zero delays compared to baseline. • Provide research avenues on artificial intelligence integration, compliance, and sustainability.

Key findings

Why it matters

This paper is about artificial intelligence and optimization in the Letter of Credit examination process in banking and contains no information on Alzheimer's disease. It reports no findings relevant to treating, curing or preventing dementia.

Study details

How this study scored 39/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 39 of 100.39 of 100 points earned61 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Decision Analytics Journal)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Decision Analytics Journal: journal h-index 59 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 14 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 4.7 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 11.5× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 14 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Laoucine Kerbache: h-index 24 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Hamad bin Khalifa University: institution h-index 280 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 39 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Khalil, M. A., Hadid, M., Padmanabhan, R., Elomri, A., & Kerbache, L. (2025). An integrated Artificial Intelligence and optimization model for operational efficiency and risk reduction in Letter of Credit examination process. Decision Analytics Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2025.100552

Vancouver

Khalil MA, Hadid M, Padmanabhan R, Elomri A, Kerbache L. An integrated Artificial Intelligence and optimization model for operational efficiency and risk reduction in Letter of Credit examination process. Decision Analytics Journal. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.dajour.2025.100552.

BibTeX

@article{khalil2025-17a12141,
  author  = {Khalil, Mounaf Asaad and Hadid, Majed and Padmanabhan, Regina and Elomri, Adel and Kerbache, Laoucine},
  title   = {{An integrated Artificial Intelligence and optimization model for operational efficiency and risk reduction in Letter of Credit examination process}},
  journal = {Decision Analytics Journal},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.dajour.2025.100552},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2025.100552}
}

Related studies in Prevention and risk

Similar studies

More on Prevention and risk

See all studies in Prevention and risk →