Topic: Genetics and APOE
Genetic studies have identified thousands of variants associated with brain-related traits. However, the majority of these map to non-coding regions and their causal roles and functional consequences are unclear. In this study, we profiled gene expression and chromatin accessibility in ∼140,000 individual nuclei from 40 post-mortem adult human brain samples from 11 donors spanning four brain regions (amygdala, hippocampus, hypothalamus and prefrontal cortex). Integrating these data with genome-wide association study statistics allowed us to prioritise specific neural cell populations relevant for complex traits. Concordant with epidemiological evidence, we prioritise similar neuronal cell populations for BMI, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and age at menarche associated variants. Our paired multiomic data also provides support for putative enhancer-gene relationships relevant to Alzheimer’s disease. These data provide a valuable resource to help interpret trait-associated genetic variation and nominate effector transcripts and cellular pathways relevant to brain-related phenotypes.
Key findings
- Genetic studies have identified thousands of variants associated with brain-related traits.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Genetics →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 16/100
Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. It scored 21 on the same rubric, but non-peer-reviewed sources are capped at 16, so it shows as 16. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 13 of the 62 points we could judge it on, which is 21 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 2 / 10 | Tier 4 — not a peer-reviewed journal (bioRxiv) |
| Journal's citation record | 0 / 4 | Not a journal article, so the journal's record does not count |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 4 / 10 | Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. Hosted on a preprint server. |
| How recent | 5 / 5 | 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 1 / 2 | Not in PubMed, but has a DOI |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 13 / 62 | Scored on 12 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 13 of the 62 points we could judge it on is 21 out of 100. |
| Total | 21 / 100 | Capped to 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed article. |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Babtie, A. C., Blake, G. E. T., Youth-GEMs Consortium, Clifton, N. E., Hawes, T., Barroso, I., et al. (2026). A single-nuclei multiomics resource across four brain regions prioritises human neural cell types influencing brain-related traits. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.24.754059
Vancouver
Babtie AC, Blake GET, Youth-GEMs Consortium, Clifton NE, Hawes T, Barroso I, et al. A single-nuclei multiomics resource across four brain regions prioritises human neural cell types influencing brain-related traits. bioRxiv. 2026. doi:10.64898/2026.09.24.754059.
BibTeX
@article{babtie2026-bc258973,
author = {Babtie, A. C. and Blake, G. E. T. and {Youth-GEMs Consortium} and Clifton, N. E. and Hawes, T. and Barroso, I. and Mill, J.},
title = {{A single-nuclei multiomics resource across four brain regions prioritises human neural cell types influencing brain-related traits}},
journal = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.64898/2026.09.24.754059},
url = {https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.24.754059}
}