Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 56 out of 100. Genetics

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Previously derived polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for Alzheimer's disease (AD) perform inconsistently across diverse ancestries. We developed an APOE-independent multiancestry AD PRS using genome-wide association study summary statistics applied to European ancestry, African American, Caribbean Hispanic and East Asian cohorts. PRS performance was evaluated in a large independent multiancestry dataset and validated in several additional multiancestry cohorts. The PRS was significantly associated with AD in European ancestry, African American, Caribbean Hispanic and Native American Hispanic groups with adjusted odds ratios between 1.14 and 1.52 per PRS standard deviation. PRS performance was validated in the replication cohorts (odds ratios: 1.21-1.65). The PRS was also associated with poorer memory, executive function and language performance, greater AD-related neuropathological burden, reduced hippocampal volume, lower cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-β 42 and elevated total tau and phosphorylated tau, with stronger phosphorylated tau associations observed in women. Our findings support the value of ancestry-aware PRSs as a component of broader multimodal risk stratification frameworks.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Kurniansyah, N., Tasaki, S., Rehman, H., Zhu, C., Farrell, J., Sherva, R., et al. (2026). A multiancestry polygenic risk score for Alzheimer's disease is associated with cognitive decline and neuropathological hallmarks in diverse populations. Nature genetics. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-026-02722-8

Vancouver

Kurniansyah N, Tasaki S, Rehman H, Zhu C, Farrell J, Sherva R, et al. A multiancestry polygenic risk score for Alzheimer's disease is associated with cognitive decline and neuropathological hallmarks in diverse populations. Nature genetics. 2026. doi:10.1038/s41588-026-02722-8. PMID: 42661068.

BibTeX

@article{kurniansyah2026-42661068,
  author  = {Kurniansyah, N. and Tasaki, S. and Rehman, H. and Zhu, C. and Farrell, J. and Sherva, R. and Hauger, R. and Merritt, V. C. and Panizzon, M. and Zhang, R. and Gaziano, J. M. and Gim, J. and others},
  title   = {{A multiancestry polygenic risk score for Alzheimer's disease is associated with cognitive decline and neuropathological hallmarks in diverse populations}},
  journal = {Nature genetics},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1038/s41588-026-02722-8},
  pmid    = {42661068},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-026-02722-8}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

A polygenic risk score built for multiple ancestries was linked to Alzheimer's diagnosis, worse memory and thinking, and more disease-related brain changes. This is a risk-stratification tool, not a way to treat, cure or prevent the disease.

Study details

Limitations

Non-European populations were under-represented in both discovery and validation datasets and ancestry-specific GWAS were absent for Native American Hispanic and Caribbean Hispanic groups; reliance on ICD codes for case ascertainment in Million Veteran Program, FinnGen and All of Us may have limited diagnostic accuracy; clinically diagnosed AD is not equivalent to biologically confirmed AD; and several non-European datasets had modest power for ancestry- or sex-specific effects.

How this study scored 56/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 3 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 3 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 3 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 55 of the 98 points it could be judged on, which is 56 of 100. Total 56 of 100.55 of the 98 points we could judge = 56 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a cohort study following people over time. Scored zero for sample size, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on free to read, so that was left out: it earned 55 of the 98 points we could judge it on, which is 56 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Nature genetics)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 Nature Genetics: journal h-index 776 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A cohort study following people over time
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 3 / 3 Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author Lindsay A. Farrer: h-index 119 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 3 / 3 University of Washington: institution h-index 3,540 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 3 / 3 OpenAlex lists 26 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 42661068)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 55 / 98 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 55 of the 98 points we could judge it on is 56 out of 100.
Total 56 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — PubMed Central lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 10 Oct 2026).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 26.

Related studies in Genetics

Also in Genetics

173 studies in the library are filed under Genetics with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Genetics hub.

Similar studies

More on Genetics

See all studies in Genetics →