Home › Research › Mild cognitive impairment
A multi-model deep convolutional neural network for automatic hippocampus segmentation and classification in Alzheimer's disease
Liu M, Li F, Yan H, Wang K, Ma Y, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, Shen L, Xu M.. NeuroImage, 2019-12-16
Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive and irreversible brain degenerative disorder. Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a clinical precursor of AD. Although some treatments can delay its progression, no effective cures are available for AD. Accurate early-stage diagnosis of AD is vital for the prevention and intervention of the disease progression. Hippocampus is one of the first affected brain regions in AD. To help AD diagnosis, the shape and volume of the hippocampus are often measured using structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, these features encode limited information and may suffer from segmentation errors. Additionally, the extraction of these features is independent of the classification model, which could result in sub-optimal performance. In this study, we propose a multi-model deep learning framework based on convolutional neural network (CNN) for joint automatic hippocampal segmentation and AD classification using structural MRI data. Firstly, a multi-task deep CNN model is constructed for jointly learning hippocampal segmentation and disease classification. Then, we construct a 3D Densely Connected Convolutional Networks (3D DenseNet) to learn features of the 3D patches extracted based on the hippocampal segmentation results for the classification task. Finally, the learned features from the multi-task CNN and DenseNet models are combined to classify disease status. Our method is evaluated on the baseline T1-weighted structural MRI data collected from 97 AD, 233 MCI, 119 Normal Control (NC) subjects in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database. The proposed method achieves a dice similarity coefficient of 87.0% for hippocampal segmentation. In addition, the proposed method achieves an accuracy of 88.9% and an AUC (area under the ROC curve) of 92.5% for classifying AD vs. NC subjects, and an accuracy of 76.2% and an AUC of 77.5% for classifying MCI vs. NC subjects. Our empirical study also demonstrates that the proposed multi-model method outperforms the single-model methods and several other competing methods.
Key findings
- Additionally, the extraction of these features is independent of the classification model, which could result in sub-optimal performance.
- Then, we construct a 3D Densely Connected Convolutional Networks (3D DenseNet) to learn features of the 3D patches extracted based on the hippocampal segmentation results for the classification task.
Why it matters
A deep learning method was developed to automatically segment the hippocampus and classify Alzheimer's disease from MRI scans. This is a technical tool for diagnosis and does not provide a treatment or cure.
Study details
- Effect size87.0%; 88.9%; 92.5%
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 56/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 54 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 56 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (NeuroImage) |
| Journal's citation record | 4 / 4 | NeuroImage: journal h-index 523 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 2 / 5 | 2020 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 2 / 3 | Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | 6 / 7 | Cited 566 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 5 / 5 | 70.8 citations a year over 8 year(s) since 2020 |
| Impact for its field and year | 5 / 6 | Cited 39.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 2 / 6 | Cited by 3 other studies in this library |
| Still being cited | 4 / 4 | Cited 227 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Mingqing Xu holds only 7 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | 2 / 3 | University of Pennsylvania: institution h-index 1,859 (OpenAlex) |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 2 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 2 countries |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 31837471) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 54 / 96 | Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 54 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 56 out of 100. |
| Total | 56 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
- DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116459
- PubMed: 31837471
- Original source →
- Free full text: NeuroImage →
Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 8 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Liu, M., Li, F., Yan, H., Wang, K., Ma, Y., Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, et al. (2020). A multi-model deep convolutional neural network for automatic hippocampus segmentation and classification in Alzheimer's disease. NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116459
Vancouver
Liu M, Li F, Yan H, Wang K, Ma Y, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, et al. A multi-model deep convolutional neural network for automatic hippocampus segmentation and classification in Alzheimer's disease. NeuroImage. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116459. PMID: 31837471.
BibTeX
@article{liu2020-31837471,
author = {Liu, M. and Li, F. and Yan, H. and Wang, K. and Ma, Y. and {Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative} and Shen, L. and Xu, M.},
title = {{A multi-model deep convolutional neural network for automatic hippocampus segmentation and classification in Alzheimer's disease}},
journal = {NeuroImage},
year = {2020},
doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116459},
pmid = {31837471},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116459}
}
Studies this one cites
Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.
Later studies that cite this one
3 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.