Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 48 out of 100. Disparities

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Objectives Many factors affect the decision to institute long-term tube-feeding in older persons. The objectives of this cross-national survey are to examine the tube-feeding decision-making process for cognitively impaired older persons from the perspective of the substitute decision-makers (SDM) and to contrast this process in US and Canadian healthcare settings. Design Survey. Setting Chronic care facilities in Ottawa and nursing homes in Boston. Participants Patients more than age 65 who were tube-fed for at least 2 months and who were unable to make their own healthcare decisions at the time of tube placement were identified at both sites. The SDMs of 46 patients in Ottawa and 48 patients in Boston were surveyed. Measurements The survey asked questions relating to the following categories: health status of the patient, advance directives, communication with the healthcare team, perceived goals of tube-feeding, decision satisfaction, and sociodemographic data. Results Tube-fed patients in Boston were more likely to have a diagnosis of dementia than those in Ottawa (60.4% vs 10.9%, P Conclusions A greater proportion of patients have feedings tubes inserted because of a degenerative dementia in Boston compared with an acute neurological event in Ottawa. Despite the difference in diagnostic indication for tube-feeding, the substitute decision-making process was seriously limited at both sites by poor implementation of the principle of substituted judgement, a need for broader advance directives, and improved transfer of knowledge between clinicians and decision-makers.

Key findings

Why it matters

This survey compared tube-feeding decisions for cognitively impaired older patients in US and Canadian care settings, finding that more patients in Boston had feeding tubes inserted because of degenerative dementia. It concerns decision-making about feeding tubes, not the treatment, cure, or prevention of Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 48/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 5 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 48 of 100.48 of 100 points earned52 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of the American Geriatrics Society)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 Journal of the American Geriatrics Society: journal h-index 344 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2000 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 1 / 4 46 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 5 / 7 Cited 114 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 4.1 citations a year over 28 year(s) since 2000
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 9.7× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 2 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author Lewis Arnold Lipsitz: h-index 109 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center: institution h-index 1,219 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 5 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 10798465)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 48 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Mitchell, S. L., Berkowitz, R. E., Lawson, F. M., & Lipsitz, L. A. (2000). A cross-national survey of tube-feeding decisions in cognitively impaired older persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb04696.x

Vancouver

Mitchell SL, Berkowitz RE, Lawson FM, Lipsitz LA. A cross-national survey of tube-feeding decisions in cognitively impaired older persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2000. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb04696.x. PMID: 10798465.

BibTeX

@article{mitchell2000-10798465,
  author  = {Mitchell, S. L. and Berkowitz, R. E. and Lawson, F. M. and Lipsitz, L. A.},
  title   = {{A cross-national survey of tube-feeding decisions in cognitively impaired older persons}},
  journal = {Journal of the American Geriatrics Society},
  year    = {2000},
  doi     = {10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb04696.x},
  pmid    = {10798465},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb04696.x}
}

Related studies in Disparities

Also tagged “cognitive-function”

1,118 studies in the library carry the topic tag “cognitive-function”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,118 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Disparities

See all studies in Disparities →