Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 34 out of 100. Tau biomarkers

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Results There was no statistically significant difference in age of patients with the CSF biomarker ratio above the cut off limit of 0.024 (80 patients, mean age 71.3 years, SD: 7.9) and ratio below the cut-off (63 patients, mean age 66.3 years, SD :10.0) using Levene’s test. We observed no racial bias (Caucasian, African American, Hispanic and others) in elevated CSF biomarker results or positive PET scans using Chi-Square test. Chi-square analysis also showed a statistically significant association between positive CSF tests and PET scans (p < 0.01). The mean pTau181/Ab42 ratio was 0.055 (SD: 0.05, range: 0.025-0.12) in patients resulted positive for the CSF biomarkers, but the ratio was 0.0138 (SD: 0.0046, range: 0.007-0.024) in patients who tested negative (differences were also statistically significant by t-test). The sensitivity of pTau181/Ab42 was 76.2%, specificity was 84.2% and positive predictive value was 84.2% when compared to PET scan findings. We observed poor correlation between standalone SCF and PET scan result using Chi-Square analysis. However, binary logistic regression demonstrated a combination of abnormal SCF, and a positive CSF screen significantly predicted a positive imaging result (N = 40, p<.001). Conclusions CSF pTau181/Ab42 ratio is a diagnostic marker for Alzheimer disease correlated well with PET scan compared to various standalone cognitive screening assessment. A negative CSF biomarker test result may help rule out Alzheimer disease. Further, a combination approach inclusive of SCF and CSF biomarkers was significant for positive PET imaging.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study found that the CSF pTau181/Ab42 ratio correlated well with PET scan findings and had a sensitivity of 76.2% and specificity of 84.2% for identifying Alzheimer's disease. It is about diagnosis, not treatment, and does not demonstrate any cure or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 34/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 0 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 34 of 100.34 of 100 points earned66 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (American Journal of Clinical Pathology)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 American Journal of Clinical Pathology: journal h-index 223 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 40 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 0 / 4 Last-listed author Candice R. Coffey: h-index 2 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 University of Kansas: institution h-index 709 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 34 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Crecelius, C., Nelson, M., Jones, A., & Coffey, C. R. (2025). 7 FDA Approved CSF Biomarkers Demonstrate Strong Predictive Value for Identification of Alzheimer Disease Based on PET Scan in Patients with Standalone Alzheimer Cognitive Screening Tests. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqaf121.434

Vancouver

Crecelius C, Nelson M, Jones A, Coffey CR. 7 FDA Approved CSF Biomarkers Demonstrate Strong Predictive Value for Identification of Alzheimer Disease Based on PET Scan in Patients with Standalone Alzheimer Cognitive Screening Tests. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2025. doi:10.1093/ajcp/aqaf121.434.

BibTeX

@article{crecelius2025-dd3a1324,
  author  = {Crecelius, Corey and Nelson, Melody and Jones, Andrew and Coffey, Candice R.},
  title   = {{7 FDA Approved CSF Biomarkers Demonstrate Strong Predictive Value for Identification of Alzheimer Disease Based on PET Scan in Patients with Standalone Alzheimer Cognitive Screening Tests}},
  journal = {American Journal of Clinical Pathology},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1093/ajcp/aqaf121.434},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqaf121.434}
}

Related studies in Tau biomarkers

Also tagged “biomarkers”

821 studies in the library carry the topic tag “biomarkers”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 821 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Tau biomarkers

See all studies in Tau biomarkers →