27,780 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia worldwide, but the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying cognitive impairment remain poorly understood. 3 key findings →
Participants: 427 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Collaborative dementia care programs are effective in addressing the needs of patients with dementia and their caregivers. 3 key findings →
Participants: 780 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The mean (SD) age was 73.9 (7.35) years among the 237 ADNI participants and 70.2 (9.7) years among the 130 Avid-A05 participants. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 237 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Sleep duration is linked to amyloid-β clearance while physical activity is associated with brain volume maintenance. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 4,322 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
After adjusting for various risk factors, participants with low socioeconomic status (vs high) had increased risk for early-onset dementia (3·38, 2·61-4·37), and overall lifestyle mediated 3·2% (1·8-5·7) of the association. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 345 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This comprehensive portrait of rural-urban differences in dementia care highlights possible geographically based inequities and can be used by researchers and decision makers to guide development of more equitable dementia care policies. 2 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Low hemoglobin and anemia are associated with cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease (AD). 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 6,833 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In addition, the underlying mechanism and driven mediators are largely unknown. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 154,549 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Plasma GFAP discriminated AD dementia from normal cognition (adjusted mean difference = 0.90 standard deviation [SD]) and mild cognitive impairment (adjusted mean difference = 0.72 SD), and demonstrated superior discrimination compared to alternative plasma biomarkers. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 567 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Pathophysiological substrate(s) and progression of Parkinson's disease (PD) with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI) are still matter of debate. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 48 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Participants were classified as hyposecretors (n = 22, median Aβ40 5,870.500 pg/mL, interquartile range [IQR] 1,431), normosecretors (n = 47, median Aβ40 10,817 pg/mL, IQR 3,622), and hypersecretors (n = 7, 19,767 pg/mL, IQR 3,088). 5 key findings →
Design: retrospective cohort Participants: 22 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
No variant passed the genome-wide significance threshold (p = 5 × 10- 8) in the case-control GWAS. 5 key findings →
Design: case-control study Participants: 285 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
As cerebral regions correlating with symptomatology differ depending on the clinical phenotype, a precise knowledge of clinical signs and symptoms is necessary when interpreting [18F]PI-2620 PET results. 1 key finding →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 72 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Cortical tau accumulation is a key pathological event that partly defines Alzheimer's disease (AD) onset and is associated with cognitive decline and future disease progression. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 59 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
This retrospective case-control study aimed to investigate associations between disease severity of Alzheimer's dementia (AD) and macular thickness. 3 key findings →
Design: case-control study Participants: 192 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
CSF was αSyn-SAA positive (αSyn+) in 36/80 AD patients (45%) and in 2/28 controls (7.1%). 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
This study examined the impact of advance care planning (ACP) on healthcare utilization among older adults with normal cognition and impaired cognition/dementia. 1 key finding →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 17,698 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Four studies were included. Two third-order constructs were generated through meta-ethnography: expectations of care and barriers to quality of care. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Donanemab treatment significantly slowed clinical progression at 76w and had a safety profile consistent with earlier studies. 5 key findings →
Participants: 1,182 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Relative to controls, greater Alzheimer's disease pathology (lower amyloid-β 42 /amyloid-β 40 , higher phosphorylated-tau-181) and synaptic degeneration (neurogranin) biomarker concentrations were associated with more adverse white matter metrics (e.g. lower neurite density, higher mean diffusivity) in patients with asthma. 4 key findings →
Design: case-control study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Pericyte damage, reflected by CSF PDGFRβ, may be involved in age-related BBB disruption together with neuroinflammation, but is not related to Alzheimer-related pathologic changes. 2 key findings →
Participants: 408 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
These findings suggest a benefit of MI plus omega 3 in positive blood amyloid subjects. 4 key findings →
Participants: 483 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Differential eligibility may contribute to underrepresentation of some minoritized racial and ethnic groups in early AD trials. 2 key findings →
Participants: 156 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The present findings provide evidence of the benefits of NIBS, especially tDCS, for beneficial effect on cognition in patients with AD. 3 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 12 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,780 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,780 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.1% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.3%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →