Twenty-six participants (15 ED clinicians, 3 caregivers, 8 community advisors) contributed perspectives. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
28,580 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Twenty-six participants (15 ED clinicians, 3 caregivers, 8 community advisors) contributed perspectives. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Four GPs and eleven physicians were interviewed, and four major themes emerged: (1) knowledge of best practices of BPSD management, (2) awareness of current challenges in BPSD management, (3) non-involvement, blame shifting and rationalisation: perceived reasons for the current challenges and (4) suggested solutions. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Enrollment of participants began on April 23, 2023. 5 key findings →
Participants: 24 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Plain Language SummaryWhat is this summary about? 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The review included 45 studies and identified key components and processes for successfully implementing advance care planning in dementia care. 5 key findings →
Participants: 45 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Six core themes were identified through the synthesis of data from 17 studies. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The two methods demonstrated a growing need for palliative care in the observed and projected period. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Catatonia is a severe and potentially life-threatening but often reversible neuropsychiatric syndrome. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Participants described AI tools as potentially helpful for obtaining information, monitoring patients, managing medications and appointments, providing companionship, and conducting logistical tasks. 1 key finding →
Participants: 30 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Individuals with dementia were more likely to have staff or family members present at death, to receive documented decisions to shift to EOL care, have symptom assessments made the final week of life and prescription of injectables. 5 key findings →
Participants: 39 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) is a common disease in older people, characterized by damage to intracranial microvessels, leading to cognitive decline, increased risk of stroke, and dementia. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
NCs/CSVD-CN: AUC =0.900, 95% CI: 0.847-0.952. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
With elevated HbA1c, greater LA-derived diol/epoxide ratios were associated with greater WMH volume (β [95% CI] = 0.565 [0.100, 1.030], p = 0.017), lower global BPF (β [95% CI] = -0.476 [-0.903, -0.048], p = 0.029), and poorer memory performance (β [95% CI] = -0.603 [-1.070, -0.136], p = 0.012), such that detrimental associations were observed only in T2DM. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We investigated the effect of using smartphone-based calendars (Google and Outlook Calendar) on prospective memory in Alzheimer's disease (AD). we recruited two groups of participants with mild AD. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
It has been reported that taurine intake in the past may have a positive effect on present cognitive function in the elderly. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 481 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
In the continuously aging society, private sectors are expected to play a role in older adult care. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
There are significant opportunities for speech-language pathologists (SLPs) to play important roles in the primary and secondary prevention of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) beyond current practices. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is often underdiagnosed, especially at early stages when symptoms are mild, and patients may benefit from new and recently approved anti-amyloid therapies. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Remote monitoring (RM) technology can support home-based dementia care by enabling (in)formal caregivers to monitor the health and safety of people with dementia remotely. 1 key finding →
Participants: 20 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the policy to reduce the reimbursement fee for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) on the number of PEG procedures performed among older adults with dementia. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Overall, 39 participants participated across the 6 stakeholder focus groups. 2 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 39 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
An Interprofessional Virtual Healthcare Neighborhood (VHN) was designed to deliver information, peer support, and professional guidance to caregivers of individuals with dementia. 2 key findings →
Participants: 28 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
This study investigated the current status and distribution of Alzheimer's disease (AD) among Mongolian and Han individuals who were at least 55 years old and living in rural areas of Inner Mongolia. 2 key findings →
Participants: 9,266 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Accessibility to food stores offering nutritious and affordable options is critical to ensure urban residents lead healthy lives. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Artificial food colors (AFCs) in foods and beverages may be harmful to children. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,580 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,580 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (62.2% of the library) and OpenAlex (17.8%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.6% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →