28,180 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
A collaborative dementia care program demonstrated significant financial benefit in a managed Medicare population. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 242 Evidence: early
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Our review supports that biofluid biomarker testing could be cost-effective to diagnose AD. 2 key findings →
Design: systematic-review Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Alzheimer's disease (AD) and cancer are among the most devastating diseases worldwide. 2 key findings →
Evidence: early
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Most strokes are covert and observed incidentally on brain scans, but their presence increases risk of overt stroke and dementia. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Dietary influences on Alzheimer disease (AD) are gaining recognition. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
They belong to the spectrum of neurodegenerative diseases that result in death or dysfunction of neurons with similarities to Alzheimer disease (AD) but also distinctive differences (reviewed (Canet et al., Front Cell Neurosci 12: 307, 2018)). 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Sleep disruption and other circadian rhythm disturbances are frequently seen in dementia patients. 2 key findings →
Participants: 30 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Autophagy induction by crocetin significantly increased Aβ clearance in N9 cells. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Classical immunohistochemical studies in the Alzheimer disease (AD) brain reveal prominent glial reactions, but whether this pathological feature is due primarily to cell proliferation or to a phenotypic change of existing resting cells remains controversial. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Amyloid (senile) plaques, one of the two pathologic hallmarks of Alzheimer disease (AD), are associated with dystrophic neurites and glial responses, both astrocytic and microglial. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In Alzheimer's disease (AD), a single-nucleotide polymorphism in the gene encoding brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF Val66Met ) is associated with worse impact of primary AD pathology (beta-amyloid, Aβ) on neurodegeneration and cognitive decline, rendering BDNF Val66Met an important modulating factor of cognitive impairment in AD. 5 key findings →
Participants: 149 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Clinical symptoms correlate with underlying neurodegenerative changes in the vast majority of people. 3 key findings →
Participants: 14 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
On the basis of the independent validation dataset, the 18 F-FDG PET model yielded a significantly higher predictive value than the amyloid PET model. 5 key findings →
Participants: 159 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Brain atrophy occurs in aging even in the absence of dementia, but it is unclear to what extent this is due to undetected preclinical Alzheimer disease. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Our trial showed that olfactory-stimulated oxygenation differences in the orbitofrontal cortex detected by fNIRS were associated with cognitive impairment and cognitive-related objectives. 5 key findings →
Design: open-label trial Participants: 97 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Amyloid imaging with PET and measuring cortical thickness with MRI are suitable biomarkers to detect disease progression in early AD within a small sample. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A subset of a dementia subgroup with characteristics predominantly associated with DM-related factors may underlie a pathophysiology different from AD, although these patients were clinically diagnosed as having AD. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 175 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Pseudotemporal measurements from baseline PET data explained 87% ( P Pseudotemporal analysis of baseline PET images is capable of predicting the regional pattern of longitudinal Aβ accumulation in AD at a group level. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 58 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Genetic pathways implicated in causing AD are related to altered levels of soluble tau through both Aβ-dependent and Aβ-independent mechanisms, which may have relevance for anti-tau drug development. 3 key findings →
Participants: 751 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
These findings indicate EXT may be more sensitive to Aβ's role in preclinical AD than level and improve targeting of individuals for AD prevention trials. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This study failed to find associations of circulating NfL and PGRN levels with frailty among community-dwelling older adults in adjusted analyses. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 403 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Development of molecular imaging agents for fibrillar β-amyloid positron-emission tomography during the past decade has brought molecular imaging of Alzheimer disease pathology into the spotlight. 1 key finding →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The mean subject score of the ADCRP was significantly higher in the A+T+ group compared to each of the other group (all p p > 0.1). 2 key findings →
Participants: 269 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A total of 1,156 Mexican American and 587 non-Hispanic White participants were included (mean age = 68 years, standard deviation = 10; 65% female). 2 key findings →
Participants: 1,156 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In MCI reverters, abnormal biomarkers for AD pathology are associated with subsequent decline. 2 key findings →
Participants: 757 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,180 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,180 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.1%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →