You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.
Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline800-272-390024 hours a day, 365 days a yearFree, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline98824/7Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline866-232-84849:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a weekLicensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat.Text: 646-586-5283
In a medical emergency, call 911.
More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.
Research
27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Find studies
Showing 1,051–1,075 of 2,047 studies published 2026(page 43 of 82)· 27,380 in the whole library·How the 0–100 score works
From OpenAlex; 12,859 studies have no institution on record and are not counted here.
A note on reading research. One study is rarely the final word.
We try to note the size of a study, whether it was in humans or animals, and how early-stage the finding is. If a summary here doesn't make that clear, treat it with extra caution and check the original source.
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 32 out of 100.·Mortality·2026-07-23
This study explored the views and experiences of Australians living with dementia relating to voluntary assisted dying (VAD) as an end-of-life care option. 2 key findings →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 32 out of 100.·Figshare·2026-02-09
Appendix B. Coding tree of main categories and specific sub categories describing factors influencing readiness for advance care planning among people with dementia, family caregivers, and healthcare professionals. 2 key findings →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 32 out of 100.·Figshare·2026-02-09
Appendix A. Interview guides on experiences with advance care planning, factors influencing readiness for advance care planning, and the use of conversation aids among people with dementia, family caregivers, and healthcare professionals. 2 key findings →
The recent approval of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for early Alzheimer's disease (AD) marks a major shift in clinical practice. 5 key findings →
This multisite initiative demonstrated that structured PPI is feasible in LMICs when supported by cultural adaptation, PPI coordinator roles, and tailored training for contributors and researchers. 1 key finding →
In this update, we discuss the use of real-world data in the Haute Autorité de Santé assessment of economic evaluations, review how real-world evidence is supporting regulatory approvals in multiple myeloma, and consider lessons from the failed EVOKE trials of semaglutide in Alzheimer's disease for the broader application of target trial emulation. 1 key finding →
Down syndrome (DS), caused by trisomy of chromosome 21, is characterized by early-onset oxidative stress, impaired neuronal development, and an increased risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD)-like neuropathology. 2 key findings →
A Doença de Alzheimer (DA) é a principal causa de demência no mundo, caracterizada por processos neurodegenerativos progressivos que comprometem cognição, comportamento e funcionalidade. 5 key findings →
Theranostics—the use of diagnostic and therapeutic drugs that target the same molecular marker of disease—extends beyond the paradigm of radiopharmaceutical drug pairs used in oncologic settings (e.g., somatostatin receptor subtype 2 and prostate-specific membrane antigen theranostics) to other 1 key finding →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 31 out of 100.·Discover Neuroscience·2026-06-30
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is characterized by progressive accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides, initiating a pathological cascade from soluble monomers to toxic oligomers, protofibrils, fibrils, and ultimately extracellular amyloid plaques that contribute to synaptic dysfunction and neuronal degeneration. 1 key finding →
5/15 Patient:innen zeigten initial einen visuell negativen Tau-PET Scan zur Baseline, davon konvertierten vier im Follow-up zu einem Tau-positiven Befund. 5 key findings →
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive brain disorder that leads to memory loss and a gradual decline in thinking and reasoning abilities. 2 key findings →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 31 out of 100.·Scientific Reports·2026-08-05
Effect size analysis proves the fact that the hybrid model produces statistically significant performance, as well as cases of clinically meaningful improvements over lightweight CNN baselines. 3 key findings →
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), a prevalent sleep-disordered breathing condition, is increasingly recognized as a modifiable risk factor for cognitive decline and dementia, including Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia. 1 key finding →
Neurodegenerative disorders (NDDs), primarily alzheimer, dementia, parkinson, and rare NDD disease, present an escalating global health crisis, currently affecting over 55 million older adults worldwide. 1 key finding →
Tauopathies are characterized by aberrant tau structure and function, which is associated with neurodegenerative dementias, such as Alzheimer's disease, Pick's disease, and frontotemporal dementia, as well as the motor neuron disease amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. 1 key finding →
In addition, we found sex-associated changes in the abundances of several proteins previously reported to be involved in tau pathology, such as Reelin, DARPP-32, Zyxin, Tbce, and Gng5, in JNPL3 mice. 4 key findings →
The Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) is among the most extensively studied dietary patterns and has been consistently associated with reduced risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, metabolic disorders, cognitive decline and several types of cancers. 2 key findings →
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription
label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled.
Show only studies that are free to read
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor,
and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a
scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the
difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself,
so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journal tierup to 10 pts
Journal's citation recordup to 4 pts
Study designup to 12 pts
Strength of evidenceup to 5 pts
Peer-review validationup to 10 pts
How recentup to 5 pts
Sample sizeup to 4 pts
Effect reportedup to 3 pts
Studied in peopleup to 3 pts
Randomised / blindedup to 2 pts
Times citedup to 7 pts
Citations per yearup to 5 pts
Impact for its field and yearup to 6 pts
Cited by studies hereup to 6 pts
Still being citedup to 4 pts
Senior author's track recordup to 4 pts
Institution's track recordup to 3 pts
Multi-centre collaborationup to 3 pts
Indexed in PubMedup to 2 pts
Free to readup to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we
could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be
worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science,
Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed
journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the
tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a
missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores
zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and
the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed
article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or
a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not
work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by
that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is
reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out →
— four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap
bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on
stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
What this library is — and isn't
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of
it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC
(60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%),
plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here,
that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the
library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any
journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card
on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a
peer-reviewed article.