28,180 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
The primary outcome is change in plasma p-tau181 concentration between baseline and following 180 days of treatment, which will be compared between the active and placebo group. 3 key findings →
Participants: 60 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
This study aims to provide confirmatory evidence of the effect of the Korean herbal medicine, KGT, on improving cognitive function in patients with aMCI. 3 key findings →
Participants: 84 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Regular musical activity as a complex multimodal lifestyle activity is proposed to be protective against age-related cognitive decline and Alzheimer's disease. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 70 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A total number of 450 participants (Mean age = 69.5 years; SD = 10.8) have been screened at different recruitment sites throughout the country, among whom 425 participants (94.4%) met the selection criteria. 2 key findings →
Participants: 450 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Baseline pRBD was associated with faster decline in global cognition and all cognitive domains, including verbal episodic memory, visuospatial ability, executive function, language, and processing speed. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Among 113,511 participants (mean age: 56.8 ± 8.09 years, female: 54.4%), a total number of 1,135 (1.00%) cases of incident dementia were identified during a median follow up period of 11.1 years [interquartile range (IQR): 10.9-11.4 years]. 4 key findings →
Participants: 500,000 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Among the 130 articles included in the review, 103 were cognitive training interventions (79%) and 27 were multimodal interventions (21%). 5 key findings →
Participants: 60 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Overall, 5,146 participants were included. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 5,146 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
DSI was significantly associated with higher risk of all-cause dementia (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.86; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.25-2.76) and Alzheimer's disease (HR = 2.12; 95% CI = 1.34-3.36). 4 key findings →
Participants: 2,051 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Numerous longitudinal studies suggest a strong association between cardiovascular risk factors and cognitive impairment. 1 key finding →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Metabolically healthy obese (MHO) individual is known to be defended from the metabolic complications of obesity. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 171 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
This study included 6406 individuals with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes from the UK Biobank. 5 key findings →
Participants: 6,406 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
There are a paucity of data regarding the role of gender and atrial fibrillation (AF) on cognitive decline and incidence of dementia. 2 key findings →
Participants: 35,608 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The global rise in both metabolic syndrome (MetS) and neurodegenerative diseases (NDs), particularly dementia and Alzheimer's disease (AD) poses a growing health and socioeconomic burden. 1 key finding →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
To investigate the correlation between hypertension development and the progression of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to dementia in middle-aged and elderly people. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Previous studies have demonstrated resilience to AD-related neuropathology in a form of cognitive reserve (CR). 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Depression and dementia are both common conditions in older people, and they frequently occur together. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Higher TRAP-NOx was associated with incident dementia (HR = 1.55 for the highest versus lower tertiles, 95% CI = 1.04, 2.55). 5 key findings →
Participants: 1,564 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Higher synaptic latent factor (β = - 0.019, pFDR = 0.021) and YKL-40 (β = - 0.020, pFDR = 0.025) significantly predicted hippocampal atrophy. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The microbiota-gut-brain axis (MGBA) is an intricate bidirectional communication network that links intestinal microbiota with the central nervous system (CNS) through immune, neural, endocrine, and metabolic pathways. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Blood-brain-barrier (BBB) dysfunction is a hallmark of aging and aging-related disorders, including cerebral small vessel disease and Alzheimer's disease. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 30 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Epidemiologic studies have reported that cancer survivors have a relatively low risk of developing dementia, but the mechanisms underlying that inverse relationship are mostly unknown. 4 key findings →
Participants: 8,121 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The TMEM106B risk variant was significantly enriched in AD cases with transactive response DNA-binding protein 43 kDa (TDP-43) pathology - associating with increased odds of developing AD TDP-43 subtype α - but failed to associate with Lewy body or vascular pathology. 3 key findings →
Participants: 2,604 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A total of 395 persons with dementia were included. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 395 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
An initial database search yielded 3,977 studies of which 22 were included in this review. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,180 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,180 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.1%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →