27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
There is an extensive body of qualitative literature on the experiences of community-dwelling individuals with dementia on receiving and adapting to a diagnosis of dementia. 1 key finding →
Design: systematic review Participants: 3,095 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This review confirms that clinically significant NPSs are common in NH patients with dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 1,458 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Cybercycling older adults achieved better cognitive function than traditional exercisers, for the same effort, suggesting that simultaneous cognitive and physical exercise has greater potential for preventing cognitive decline. 4 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Cancer survivors had a lower risk of Alzheimer's disease than those without cancer, and patients with Alzheimer's disease had a lower risk of incident cancer. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,278 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD) is associated with cholinergic deficits. 4 key findings →
Participants: 550 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
The grey matter of the brain contains high levels of the essential nutrient DHA. 1 key finding →
Participants: 285 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The intent-to-treat analysis indicated a favorable effect of GHRH on cognition (P=.03), which was comparable in adults with MCI and healthy older adults. 1 key finding →
Participants: 152 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In the 1990 subcohort (25,696 person-years), 286 persons developed dementia, and in the 2000 subcohort (8,384 person-years), 49 persons. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 5,727 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Most cross-sectional and longitudinal studies suggest an association between cognitive impairment and CKD. 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 54,779 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Future interventions should address subjective fatigue when managing cognitive and functional abilities in community-dwelling older adults. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In our large population-based sample, frailty syndrome was a short-term predictor of overall dementia and VaD. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 2,581 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The objective of this study was to examine exercise effects on global brain volume, hippocampal volume, and cortical thickness in schizophrenia patients and healthy controls. 2 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Genetic variants that modify brain gene expression may also influence risk for human diseases. 5 key findings →
Participants: 197 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
We identified a new genetic risk association of AD with rare coding CLU variations that is independent of the 5' common association signal identified in the GWA studies. 3 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 1,930 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Association of HT use and risk of AD may depend on timing of use. 4 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers may be useful to monitor the effects of novel disease-modifying anti-Aβ drugs in clinical trials. 3 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 19 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Recommendations for practice include development of standardized guidelines that address caregiver assessment, education, and resources; identification of "caregiver champions" in practice settings; provision of referrals to established support organizations for caregivers (eg, Cancer Support Community, Cancer Care); and collaboration among caregiving, professional, and cancer-related organizations to advocate policy and practice changes for family caregivers. 1 key finding →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Patients with the repeat expansion had significantly more co-morbid FTD than patients without the repeat (50%vs 12%), and a distinct pattern of non-motor cortex changes on high-resolution 3 T magnetic resonance structural neuroimaging. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 49 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Their results on motor testing from the preceding years were plotted, and then assessed with regression analysis, to determine when markers first deviated from normal values. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 78 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Study objectives To examine the association of sleep complaints reported at baseline (insomnia complaints and excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS)) and medication, with cognitive decline in community-dwelling elderly. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 4,894 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In subjects with MCI and evidence of amyloid pathology, the injury markers CSF t-tau and p-tau and hippocampal atrophy can predict further cognitive decline. 1 key finding →
Design: cohort study Participants: 110 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In patients with sporadic ALS, we identified the repeat expansion in 236 (7·0%) of 3377 white individuals from the USA, Europe, and Australia, two (4·1%) of 49 black individuals from the USA, and six (8·3%) of 72 Hispanic individuals from the USA. 1 key finding →
Participants: 4,448 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
However, few longitudinal Pittsburgh compound B-positron emission tomography studies have tested this hypothesis, and with conflicting results. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 32 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Five databases were searched for English-language studies up to August 2010, and included all study designs with a comparative group. 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Florbetapir F 18 PET can image amyloid-β (Aβ) aggregates in the brains of living subjects. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 51 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →