27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
The study consists of 25,186 patients (mean age = 63.0, interquartile range [IQR] of age = 15.1 years, male = 50%). 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 25,186 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In Alzheimer's disease, post-mortem studies have shown that the first cortical site where neurofibrillary tangles appear is the transentorhinal region, a subregion within the medial temporal lobe that largely overlaps with Brodmann area 35, and the entorhinal cortex. 5 key findings →
Participants: 215 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Compared to age matched controls, in the AD group, we found increases in both spectral power and coherence at the slower frequencies (Delta, Theta). 5 key findings →
Participants: 26 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Understanding the mental health consequences of child maltreatment at different life stages is important in accurately quantifying the burden of maltreatment. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 56,082 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The objective of this study was to investigate whether increased NLR in older adults is independently associated with the risk of subsequent dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 1,648 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The key pathological hallmarks-extracellular plaques and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles (NFT)-described by Alois Alzheimer in his seminal 1907 article are still central to the postmortem diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD), but major advances in our understanding of the underlying pathophysiology as well as significant progress in clinical diagnosis and therapy have changed the perspective and importance of neuropathologic evaluation of the brain. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Air pollution is one of the most serious environmental problems that afflict our planet and one of the greatest risk factors for human health. 3 key findings →
Design: systematic review Participants: 20 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
In the present study, higher adherence to MeDi was associated with a reduced risk for dementia and cognitive decline in a traditional Mediterranean population. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 62 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Compared with 2000, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for the increase in NIV use was 2.63 (95% CI, 2.46-2.82; % receipt: 0.8% vs 2.0%) for 2005 and 11.84 (95% CI, 11.11-12.61; % receipt: 0.8% vs 7.1%) for 2017. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In tandem with the ever-increasing aging population in low and middle-income countries, the burden of dementia is rising on the African continent. 1 key finding →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
P-tau181 detected AD at MCI and dementia stages and was strongly associated with cognitive decline and gray matter loss. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), an astrocytic cytoskeletal protein, can be measured in blood samples, and has been associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD). 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 63 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Mass spectrometry plasma measures performed significantly better than any other measure (amyloid-β1-42/1-40: 0.817; 0.770-0.864 and amyloid-β composite: 0.820; 0.775-0.866). 2 key findings →
Participants: 502 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A blood-based screening tool can serve as a method for increasing access to state-of-the-art AD clinical research by bridging between community-based and clinic-based settings. 2 key findings →
Participants: 1,649 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
These results indicate that declines in connected speech may be related to preclinical AD. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Receiving two types of vaccinations versus one type was associated with lower dementia risk. 5 key findings →
Participants: 80,070 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A simple blood test for GFAP, a protein released by activated star-shaped brain support cells called astrocytes, could identify which patients with mild memory problems had underlying Alzheimer's pathology and predict, years in advance, who would go on to develop Alzheimer's dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 160 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Although all p-tau variants increased across the AD continuum, p-tau217 Lilly showed the greatest dynamic range (13-fold increase vs 1.9-5.4-fold increase for other p-tau variants for AD dementia vs non-AD). 2 key findings →
Participants: 334 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
These findings underscore the importance of blood pressure control in midlife to mitigate dementia risk. 5 key findings →
Participants: 229,976 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A decade has passed since we published a comprehensive review in this journal addressing the topic of promoting successful cognitive aging, making this a good time to take stock of the field. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Blood-based AD biomarker concentrations are associated with pathological and clinical diagnoses and can predict future development of clinical AD, providing evidence that they can be incorporated into multi-ethnic, community-based studies. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Compared with men, women had decreased risk of any LEA (hazard ratio [HR], 0.34 [95% CI, 0.31-0.37]). 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In this diverse community-based cohort, cross-sectional data revealed significant race/ethnic disparities in the prevalence of MCI and dementia. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 989 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The structure and integrity of the ageing brain is interchangeably linked to physical health, and cardiometabolic risk factors (CMRs) are associated with dementia and other brain disorders. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Digital cognitive tests showed good performances for MCI and dementia. 1 key finding →
Participants: 56 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →