Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

Find studies

Showing 126–150 of 217 studies in bioRxiv (page 6 of 9) · 27,780 in the whole library · How the 0–100 score works

Download bibliography of these 217 studies, in this order: BibTeX (.bib) · RIS (.ris)

Browse by subject, author or institution

Each number is how many studies that link shows, with your other filters kept.

A note on reading research. One study is rarely the final word.

We try to note the size of a study, whether it was in humans or animals, and how early-stage the finding is. If a summary here doesn't make that clear, treat it with extra caution and check the original source.

High-Content Screening Identifies Dithiocarbamates As A Class Of Chemicals That Disrupts TDP-43 Proteostasis

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-08-19

Transactive response DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) aggregation and loss of function are hallmark features of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) among other neurodegenerative diseases. 3 key findings →

Evidence: low

Diesel exhaust particles disrupt mouse and human iPSC-derived microglial function and Amyloid-β clearance in Alzheimer’s disease models

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-07-23

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is one of the most common neurodegenerative disorders, yet the environmental drivers that accelerate its progression remain poorly defined. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

Induction of ferroptotic and amyloidogenic signatures linked to Alzheimer’s disease by chemically distinct air pollutants

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-01-07

Air pollution (AirP) exposure is associated with increased Alzheimer’s disease (AD) risk, yet AirP is chemically heterogeneous, complicating identification of shared pathogenic drivers. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

Magnetic Field–Enhanced Docosahexaenoic Acid Delivery for Acetylcholine Restoration in Alzheimer’s Disease: an In Silico Study

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-10-05

Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) is characterised by the progressive depletion of Acetylcholine (ACh), a neurotransmitter essential for cognition and synaptic communication. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

Postmortem Alterations of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors across Neuropsychiatric Disorders: A Systematic Review

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-09-03

Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) regulate glutamatergic transmission and have been implicated in diverse neuropsychiatric disorders, but human postmortem evidence remains fragmented. 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

High-content imaging of live microglia-containing Alzheimer’s disease brain organoids

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-10-27

This method establishes a platform for high-throughput longitudinal drug screening in immunocompetent human COs that will enable the identification of new therapeutic candidates to modulate Aβ aggregation, glial reactivity, and neurodegeneration. 5 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate

Stimulating microglial neuroinflammation with amyloid-beta oligomers compatible with solid-state NMR structural characterization

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-10-20

Soluble amyloid-β (Aβ) oligomers are considered the primary neurotoxic species in Alzheimer’s disease, yet the relationship between oligomer structure and biological activity remains poorly understood. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

We define an astrocyte–microglia axis in which astrocytic sEH limits EET availability and thereby sustains microglial STING signaling. 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

Insulin fails to mitigate amyloid pathology but modulates intestinal morphology in the 5xFAD model revealed by synchrotron-based XPCT

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-10-16

Intranasal insulin has been investigated as a metabolic intervention in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but its effects across the brain–gut axis remain unclear. 4 key findings →

Evidence: low

These findings identify TTR as a contributor of adaptive neurovascular homeostasis during gut-derived neuroinflammation. 3 key findings →

Evidence: low

Gut community-level analysis reveals an altered balance between Phocaeicola vulgatus and Bacteroides fragilis in Alzheimer’s disease

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-08-13

Gut microbiome differences in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are typically cataloged taxon by taxon, yet bacterial competition and cross-feeding make species’ roles dependent on the entire community. 1 key finding →

Participants: 274 Evidence: moderate

Depth-Dependent Alterations in Cerebral Blood and Tissue Oxygenation Associated with Tau in Alzheimer’s Disease Models

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-10-16

Vascular dysfunction is increasingly recognized as a feature of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and inadequate oxygen delivery may contribute to neuronal death. 5 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate

FDA-approved carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs) have shown robust efficacy in reducing amyloid-β (Aβ) pathology, neurodegeneration, and cerebrovascular dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) models, highlighting carbonic anhydrase (CAs) as a promising, previously untapped therapeutic target for AD and vascular contribution to dementia. 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

Disease stage-sensitive MFSD2A-caveolae axis insigates hippocampal blood–brain barrier disruption in Alzheimer’s disease

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-10-08

Blood-brain barrier (BBB) malfunction contributes to pathophysiology of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), yet the mechanisms that confer hippocampal endotheliocytes vulnerability remain unclear. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

APOE4 reduction in vascular-associated fibroblasts decreases cerebral amyloid angiopathy and associated vascular dysfunction

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-10-04

Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), characterized by cerebrovascular amyloid deposition, is strongly associated with Alzheimer’s disease, ischemic injury, and lobar hemorrhages. 4 key findings →

Evidence: low

The Alzheimer’s Disease-associated gene CD2AP regulates permeability of endothelial cells and transendothelial migration of immune cells

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-10-02

Variants at the CD2AP locus, which encodes a branched-actin regulator, are associated with late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and CD2AP-deficient mice show increased blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability. 3 key findings →

Evidence: low

Neurodegeneration-inducing macromolecules exit the brain via nanovascular conduits formed by reticular fibroblasts

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-09-27

Accumulation of proteins such as amyloid β (Aβ), hyperphosphorylated tau and α-synuclein within the brain alters neural information processing and causes neurodegeneration 1–3 , but how toxic solutes are cleared from the brain remains highly controversial 4,5 . 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

↑ Change the filters

Where “Free full text” comes from

Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read

How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped

This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.

  • Journal tier up to 10 pts
  • Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
  • Study design up to 12 pts
  • Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
  • Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
  • How recent up to 5 pts
  • Sample size up to 4 pts
  • Effect reported up to 3 pts
  • Studied in people up to 3 pts
  • Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
  • Times cited up to 7 pts
  • Citations per year up to 5 pts
  • Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
  • Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
  • Still being cited up to 4 pts
  • Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
  • Institution's track record up to 3 pts
  • Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
  • Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
  • Free to read up to 2 pts

Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.

Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.

We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.

The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.

See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,780 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.

What this library is — and isn't

This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,780 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.1% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.3%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.

1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.

See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →

Newest studies, as a dated timeline →    Atom feed