27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Higher concentrations may reflect the intensity of the disease in FTD and are associated with more rapid atrophy of the frontal lobes. 3 key findings →
Participants: 74 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We investigated induction of α-secretase A disintegrin and metalloprotease 10 (ADAM10) by the synthetic retinoid acitretin (Neotigason; Actavis, München-Riem, Germany) in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease (AD) via measurement of CSF content of α-secretase-derived amyloid precursor protein (APPs-α). 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Cognitive decline associated with Parkinson disease (PD) is common and highly disabling. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 45 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
ATN (β-amyloid [Aβ], tau, neurodegeneration) system categorizes individuals based on their core Alzheimer disease (AD) biomarkers. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 410 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The association between vascular risk factors and dementia varies with age, making generalizability of dementia risk prediction rules to individuals of different ages challenging. 4 key findings →
Participants: 4,899 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We examined the pattern of cognitive impairment and rate of cognitive and functional decline as a function of age at symptom onset in 127 patients with probable Alzheimer's disease (AD). 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 127 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
A total of 807 K-ROAD participants (median age 72.0 years, 58.7% female) and 230 ADNI participants (median age 70.9 years, 49.1% female) were analyzed. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 807 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Of 2,323 MEMENTO participants, 2,136 (92%) were included in this study. 5 key findings →
Design: prospective cohort Participants: 307 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Carriers (n = 39) and noncarriers (n = 36) had similar neuropsychological performance, except for lower Letter Digit Substitution Test scores in carriers. 5 key findings →
Design: case-control study Participants: 39 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Plasma Aβ42/Aβ40, especially when combined with age and APOE ε4 status, accurately diagnoses brain amyloidosis and can be used to screen cognitively normal individuals for brain amyloidosis. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
During the 17-year follow-up period, 164 participants developed dementia; 136 of these cases were AD. 5 key findings →
Participants: 164 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
If confirmed in longitudinal studies, these data would suggest circulating beta-amyloid peptide as a novel biomarker or risk factor for microvascular damage in these common diseases of the elderly. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 54 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Patients with DLB had an increased risk of mortality vs patients with AD (hazard ratio [HR] 1.88, 95% CI: 1.4 to 2.5). 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 315 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
This should be considered when designing protocols for amyloid-modifying clinical trials. 1 key finding →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
CLU and MS4A4A eSNPs may at least partly explain the LOAD risk association at these loci. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Analysis of cross-sectional data from the AIBL study indicates that plasma apoE levels are altered in AD and correlate with AD pathology level. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,079 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Unlike Alzheimer disease, for which the APOE-epsilon4 allele increases the prevalence and the APOE-epsilon2 allele is protective, the authors' analysis shows the APOE-epsilon2 allele, but not the APOE-epsilon4 allele, to be positively associated with sporadic Parkinson disease. 3 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
These findings from healthy high-risk older individuals suggest that OI reflects degree of preclinical AD pathology, while its relationships with age and cognition result from the association of these latter variables with such pathology. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 101 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
There was a significant interaction between cholesterol, APOE-epsilon4, and the risk of Alzheimer disease (AD) in the Yoruba, a population that has lower cholesterol levels and lower incidence rates of AD compared to African Americans. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 1,075 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Our results provide evidence supporting 25OHD as a causal risk factor for AD. 5 key findings →
Participants: 33,996 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The findings support the cross-cultural use of a relatively inexpensive odor identification test as an early biomarker of cognitive decline and AD dementia. 1 key finding →
Participants: 1,037 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Long-term NSAID use may reduce the risk of AD, provided such use occurs well before the onset of dementia. 2 key findings →
Participants: 104 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Although we have found a slightly lower risk than other reports, the risk of developing neurodegenerative disease in idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder is substantial, with the majority of patients developing Parkinson disease and Lewy body dementia. 2 key findings →
Participants: 113 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Levels of autolysosomal proteins in neurally derived blood exosomes distinguish patients with AD from case controls and appear to reflect the pathology of AD up to 10 years before clinical onset. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 26 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Over a median follow-up of 5.1 years, 153 of 534 participants (28.7%) with prevalent or incident MCI progressed to dementia (71.3 per 1,000 person-years). 2 key findings →
Participants: 534 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →