27,780 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
The study included 44 iRBD patients (81.8% males, mean age 71.0 ± 6.4 years), 55 HC (66.3% males, mean age 69.1 ± 5.5 years), and 28 AD patients (82.1% males, mean age of 70.4 ± 6.7 years). iRBD patients showed significantly higher plasma NfL and GFAP levels and similar pTau181 levels compared to HC. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 44 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
White matter hyperintensities (WMH) is mainly caused by cerebrovascular injury and may also increase the possibilities of progression to Alzheimer's disease. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,029 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Regular physical activity was positively associated with CSF Aβ42 (p < 0.001) and Aβ42/40 (p < 0.001), while it was negatively associated with p-tau/Aβ42 (p < 0.001) and t-tau/Aβ42 (p < 0.001). 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 918 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The CSF A/T profiles included 49 A+/T+, 8 A+/T-, and 41 A-/T-. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 98 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The data of 1734 participants (1158 with AD, 105 with DLB, 46 with VaD, and 425 with CN) were analyzed. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,734 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Compared to CSF p-tau, meta-temporal, and averaged Braak tau PET ROIs, SPARE-Tau showed the strongest association with baseline ADAS-cog13 scores and diagnosis. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 587 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Voxel-wise analysis showed higher meningeal off-target binding in women compared to men across all three tracers. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 165 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In the cross-sectional study, CLs in both the Aβ- and the Aβ+ groups were impacted by the FWHM of the reconstruction method. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 89 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
We observed a dose-response association between higher alcohol consumption in 2006 and worse sleep quality in 2012 (Ptrend < 0·001), after adjusting for age, sex, socio-economic status, smoking status, physical activity, obesity, plasma lipid profiles, diabetes and hypertension. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 905 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Caregivers showed a greater discrepancy in sleep duration than did noncaregivers (-0.46 hour vs 0.22 hour, respectively; P = .003). 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 122 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The mean age was 58.4 years (SD = 6.2). A 20-dB (equivalent to a one-category worsening) increase in HL was associated with a -1.53 (95% CI, -2.11, -0.94) raw score point difference in the DSST, adjusting for demographics, hearing aid use, and cardiovascular disease. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 5,277 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Vision impairment is common among older persons. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 2,214 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Greater educational attainment and mental activity were associated with higher composite SPPB scores and those of its three subtests (p < 0.05). 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 4,714 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
From March 2019 to March 2020, 264 patients were included. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 264 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
There was a significant interaction between PASE and MIND on executive functioning and total grey matter volume. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 132 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The mean age of the patients was 73.1 ± 11.7, and the time since diagnosis was 3.9 ± 3.1 years; 64.8% had Alzheimer's type dementia, and 53.4% (n = 47) had mild dementia. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 47 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Advance care planning (ACP) can help reduce end-of-life care challenges for persons with Alzheimer's disease and related dementia and their care partners. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 17,698 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
To explore people's intentions to opt for a good death when planning for their end-of-life care, this study examined the type of end-of-life care preferred by patients receiving advance care planning (ACP) consulting services for five specified clinical and disability conditions and possible factors affecting their decision-making. 1 key finding →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,303 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
This study directly compared four different commercial/lab p-tau217 blood tests (Lumipulse, ALZpath, Johnson & Johnson, and NULISA) in 344 people from two community cohorts, most of whom were cognitively normal or had only mild changes. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 344 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
This cross-sectional evaluation of the NIA-AA criteria for preclinical AD indicates that the 1-3 staging criteria coupled with stage 0 and SNAP categories classify 97% of CN subjects from a population-based sample, leaving only 3% unclassified. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Global PET amyloid burden was compared with regards to cognitive status, APOE ɛ4 status, sex, age, and estimated years to symptom onset. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 216 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
These results suggest that plasma biomarkers can augment detection of preclinical AD among asymptomatic individuals and improve the specificity of AD diagnosis. 1 key finding →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 746 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Our findings suggest that poor olfaction is associated with multiple AD-related and other neurodegenerative processes. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,545 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Women show better verbal memory than men in aMCI despite similar levels of brain hypometabolism. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 672 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This advantage may represent a sex-specific form of cognitive reserve delaying verbal memory decline until more advanced disease stages. 1 key finding →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 379 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,780 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,780 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.1% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.3%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →