27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
There is consistent evidence supporting an association between AF and increased incidence of dementia in patients with stroke whereas there remains considerable uncertainty about any link in the broader population. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 46,637 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Presence and severity of WMH are associated with substantially increased risk of dementia, functional impairment, stroke recurrence, and mortality after ischemic stroke. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 104 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Among postmenopausal women aged 65 years or older, estrogen plus progestin did not improve cognitive function when compared with placebo. 5 key findings →
Participants: 2,145 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Both increased sympathetic activity and decreased parasympathetic activity seem to be associated with a worse performance in the cognitive domains considered, in the absence of dementia and severe cardiovascular diseases or other medical and psychiatric diseases. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review Participants: 19,431 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
AF is independently associated with increased risk of dementia. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 77,668 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Among 14 placebo-controlled trials of elderly patients with dementia reporting a total global outcome score that includes symptoms such as psychosis, mood alterations, and aggression, small but statistically significant effects sizes ranging from 0.12 and 0.20 were observed for aripiprazole, olanzapine, and risperidone. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review Participants: 1,000 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Our results revealed that both TMS and tDCS elicit a small trans-diagnostic effect on working memory, tDCS also improved attention/vigilance across diagnoses. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 2,784 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
WMH were associated with increased risk of cognitive dysfunction and could become a neuroimaging indicator of dementia. 3 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 19,040 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Twenty-three articles were included in the systematic review, and 21 in the meta-analysis. 2 key findings →
Design: systematic review Participants: 7,000 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Our objectives were to investigate the utility of the Hachinski Ischemic Score (HIS) in differentiating patients with pathologically verified Alzheimer's disease (AD), multi-infarct dementia (MID), and "mixed" (AD plus cerebrovascular disease) dementia, and to identify the specific items of the HIS that best discriminate those dementia subtypes. 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 312 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
White matter hyperintensities are associated with an increased risk of all-dementia and Alzheimer's disease in the general population. 3 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 3,913 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Hypertension significantly increases the risk of vascular dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 768 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
These data demonstrate that donepezil is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for VaD and show it may have an important place in the management of this condition. 5 key findings →
Participants: 603 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
We identified 24 relevant studies of 7575 patients, including 2860 with lacunar stroke; 24% had MCI or dementia post stroke. 3 key findings →
Participants: 6,478 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Analysis of error types provides useful information about the stages and processes involved in normal and aphasic word production. 3 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 64 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
This study found that long-term exposure to air pollution was associated with a higher risk of dementia. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 4,590 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Our data show that elderly patients with DM without dementia have accelerated progression of brain atrophy with significant consequences in cognition compared to subjects without DM. 5 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Participants: 89 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Analysis included patients treated with an atypical antipsychotic, compared with placebo Main results Sixteen placebo controlled trials have been completed with atypical antipsychotics although only nine had sufficient data to contribute to a meta-analysis and only five have been published in full in peer reviewed journals. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Evidence suggests that AF is associated with a higher risk for cognitive impairment and dementia, with or without a history of clinical stroke. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
After multivariable adjustment, patients showed an odds ratio (OR) of 1·61 (95% CI 0·80-3·25) for scale 4 versus scale 3 and 4·60 (1·85-11·48) for scale 5-6 versus scale 3 for diffusion impairment; OR 0·88 (0·66-1·17) for scale 4 versus scale 3 and OR 1·76 (1·05-2·96) for scale 5-6 versus scale 3 for anxiety or depression, and OR 0·87 (0·68-1·11) for scale 4 versus scale 3 and 2·75 (1·61-4·69) for scale 5-6 versus scale 3 for fatigue or muscle weakness. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 94 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Statin users were less likely to have incident dementia/cognitive impairment without dementia during a 5-year follow-up. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,674 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Our study found that midlife stage 1 and stage 2 systolic hypertension is associated with increased risk of AD by 18 and 25%, respectively, although no association was found for diastolic hypertension. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Vascular dementia (VD) is a neurocognitive disorder whose precise definition is still up for debate. 1 key finding →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Atypical antipsychotics are associated with an increased risk of stroke. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Hypertension after age 65 years is not associated with AD and does not adversely affect memory, language, or general cognitive function. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 1,259 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →