Combining physical exercise with cognitive training is a popular intervention in dementia prevention trials and guidelines. 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Research
30,980 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Effective learning in old age, particularly in those at risk for dementia, is essential for prolonging independent living. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Intervention participants with MCI self-reported, or demonstrated, improved functioning across a range of cognitive (global cognitive function, executive function, processing speed, memory, attention, mood, emotion, motivation, brain cortex, orientation), and physical (gait, balance, mobility) outcomes. 2 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
It is unclear what non-pharmacological interventions to prevent cognitive decline should comprise. 3 key findings →
Participants: 12 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The review's analysis confirmed that adherence to the MedDiet is associated with some improvement in cognitive health. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Overall, the psychological intervention and cognitive training may be beneficial to cognitive function and psychological well-being. 4 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In this study, we explored whether several individual self-reported health behaviors were associated with cognitive decline when considered simultaneously, using data from the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention (WRAP), an Alzheimer's disease risk-enriched cohort who were non-demented and in late midlife at baseline. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 828 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Higher vitamin D intake is associated with decreased risk of dementia in a multiethnic cohort. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 329 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Maintaining or improving quality of life (QoL) and well-being is a universal goal across the lifespan. 3 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Efficacy Study participants (n = 1082, 40 clusters) were 75.1 ± 6.3 years old, 68.7% women, and 64.7% prefrail/frail; analytic clusters: 19 intervention (410/549 completed) vs. 21 control (375/533 completed). 2 key findings →
Participants: 1,082 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Healthy lifestyles are promising targets for prevention of cognitive aging, yet the optimal time windows for interventions remain unclear. 2 key findings →
Design: case-control study Participants: 1,496 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In line with data from elderly population samples, Mediterranean and MIND diet and some data-derived dietary patterns were related to memory and language function. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 60 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Combined low plasma Aβ 42 /Aβ 40 ratio and high plasma NfL level was associated with greater declines in cognition and gait speed over time, providing further evidence of the links between cognitive and physical function. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 452 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Closer Mediterranean diet adherence was associated with lower risk of cognitive impairment but not slower decline in cognitive function. 5 key findings →
Participants: 7,756 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A total of 887 (69.5%) participants reported incident difficulty in at least one IADL task category. 5 key findings →
Participants: 1,277 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The sample included 55.6% patients with MCI and 56 people with SCD. 5 key findings →
Participants: 55 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
50/100
Multiple sclerosis is a chronic, demyelinating disease of the CNS. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
EGb 761 ® is currently recommended in multiple guidelines for the symptomatic treatment of MCI. 2 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
This untargeted metabolomics study identified potential biomarkers for cognitive function in a cohort of Puerto Rican older adults. 2 key findings →
Participants: 736 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The present work contributes to the literature on ICT usability needs of users with MCI. 3 key findings →
Participants: 28 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A growing body of evidence supports that aerobic exercise can decrease the risk of future cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease (AD). 5 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Aging induces cellular and molecular changes including modification of stem cell pools. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Multidomain interventions were associated with improvements on locomotion (as measured by performance-based tests of lower-limb function) and vitality (as measured by handgrip strength); benefits on cognitive function were also found, in particular among populations at increased risk of dementia and when operationalizing strong multidomain interventions (eg, using regular exercise training instead of physical activity advices). 5 key findings →
Design: narrative review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Cognitive decline because of aging and neurodegeneration has become increasingly prevalent. 1 key finding →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Globally, 985 million women are aged 50 and over, leading to increasing concerns about chronic conditions such as cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, dementia, and cognitive decline, which can adversely affect quality of life and independent living. 5 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Where “Free full text” comes from
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 30,980 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
What this library is — and isn't
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 30,980 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (65.2% of the library) and OpenAlex (16.4%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,042 records (3.4% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 967 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →
Newest studies, as a dated timeline → Atom feed Where this research is being discussed: events