GWAS of Alzheimer's disease have been predominantly based on European ancestry cohorts with clinically diagnosed patients. 2 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Research
27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Lewy body dementia (LBD) is the second most prevalent dementia, however most genetic risk remains uncharacterized. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
To date, DNA methylation is the best characterized epigenetic modification in Alzheimer's disease. 1 key finding →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Of 4467 participants who underwent 9208 longitudinal cognitive sessions, 2698 (60.4%) were female, and the mean age (SD) was 74.3 (9.2) years; 3213 were cognitively unimpaired, 972 had mild cognitive impairment, and 282 had AD dementia. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 4,467 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
First, we mapped SVs across 81 AD risk loci and discovered 22 SVs in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with GWAS lead variants and directly associated with the phenotypes tested. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,088 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Two regions achieved genome-wide significance with TDP-43: apolipoprotein E (APOE) and TMEM106B. Three loci reached genome-wide significance with HS: APOE, TMEM106B, and granulin precursor (GRN). 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 9,509 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We provide evidence for 16 novel AD loci and advocate for more studies using whole genome sequencing-based GWAS of diverse cohorts. 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 432,374 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Delirium is an acute change in cognition, common in hospitalized older adults, and associated with high healthcare and human cost; however, delirium's genetic and proteomic background remains poorly understood. 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 1,059,130 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Both environmental exposures and genetics are known to play important roles in shaping human aging. 5 key findings →
Participants: 492,567 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
65/100
Alongside APOE ε4, iPRS-DEM may refine risk stratification for the enrichment of dementia clinical trials and prevention programs. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 241,935 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The genetic component of early-onset Alzheimer disease (EOAD), accounting for ~10% of all Alzheimer's disease (AD) cases, is largely unexplained. 3 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 19,668 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
APOE shows a heterogeneous effect on ADRD risk in our Hispanics/Latinos sample, the largest to date. 4 key findings →
Design: case-control Participants: 12,221 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene is the best established genetic risk factor for Alzheimer's disease in later life, with the ε4 allele conferring higher risk. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 9,496 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In a total of 602 autopsy cases (median [IQR] age at death, 78 [71-85] years; 328 male [54.5%] and 274 female [45.5%]), higher PM2.5 exposure prior to death was associated with increased odds of more severe Alzheimer disease neuropathologic change (ADNC) (odds ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.11-1.28). 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 602 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Nine female-specific associations were identified and replicated, involving ADGRV1, OR3A3, IFI27L1, LYRM1, STAP2, TSTD2, PDYN, and TMEM50B. We observed the preponderance of protective female-specific associations in neurons. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A polygenic score (PGS) for Alzheimer's disease (AD) was derived recently from data on genome-wide significant loci in European ancestry populations. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Expression profiles of amacrine cells (interneurons within the retina) were robustly enriched in schizophrenia genetic risk across mammalian species and in different developmental stages. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 36 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
EOAD, although sharing genes with LOAD, harbors unique genes and pathways that could be used to create better prediction models or target identification. 2 key findings →
Design: case-control Participants: 25,236 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 809 participants (mean [SD] age at death, 91.3 [6.1] years; 538 [72%] female; mean [SD] follow-up, 7.2 [4.4] years), HS was present in 82 (10.1%) participants; 71 participants (9%) had both HS and LATE-NC, and in the scored subset, 43 participants (14%) had moderate and 35 participants (12%) had severe hippocampal neuronal loss. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 300 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Known and novel signals were identified via G/T/PWAS. 5 key findings →
Participants: 15,480 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
59/100
Three genome-wide significant associations were identified for p-tau181: TUBAP/rs76523946, P = 2.21E-08; CTNND2/rs142510573, P = 3.04E-08; CLSTN2/rs112448655, P = 3.04E-08, and one for t-tau (JHY/rs77264104, P = 2.84E-08). 5 key findings →
Participants: 375 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
We found genome-wide significant signals for agitation, anxiety, apathy, delusions, and hallucinations that were driven by the apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 allele. 5 key findings →
Participants: 12,800 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Dysregulated microglia activation, leading to neuroinflammation, is crucial in neurodegenerative disease development and progression. 1 key finding →
Participants: 90,716 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Our findings highlight the importance of personalized risk assessments and the development of tailored interventions based on genetic background to prevent dementia more effectively. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 182,473 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
58/100
Of 413 477 All of Us participants, 2038 were eligible. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 26 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Where “Free full text” comes from
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
What this library is — and isn't
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →