78/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 78 out of 100.
·
Neurology
·
2013-08-02
Diuretic, ARB, and ACE-I use was, in addition to and/or independently of mean systolic blood pressure, associated with reduced risk of AD dementia in participants with normal cognition, while only diuretic use was associated with reduced risk in participants with MCI. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 1,928
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
77/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 77 out of 100.
·
EClinicalMedicine
·
2024-07-10
Each matched cohort included 23,386 (semaglutide vs sitagliptin), 22,584 (vs empagliflozin), and 19,206 (vs glipizide) patients. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 23,386
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
The sample was mostly female (65%), White (76%), and 74 years old on average. 5 key findings →
Design: retrospective cohort
Participants: 342,608
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
In patients without baseline cognitive dysfunction, short-term data are most compatible with no adverse effect of statins on cognition, and long-term data may support a beneficial role for statins in the prevention of dementia. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 23,443
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
This study provides evidence that the effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists may extend beyond their known metabolic and cardioprotective benefits to include neuroprotection, associated with a decreased risk of developing various neurodegenerative disorders. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 102,935
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Mean age was 65 years and 43% were female. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 158
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Ankylosing spondylitis is associated with increased risk for vascular mortality. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 473
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Continued lithium treatment was associated with reduction of the rate of dementia to the same level as that for the general population. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 16,238
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
The COMCID trial will identify the therapeutic potential of cilostazol. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Overall, 214,442 matched individuals initiated GLP-1 RAs or DPP4i (109,731 women, mean age 58.6 years [SD 12], and mean HbA1c 7.7% [1.4]). 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), originally developed for type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity, are increasingly recognized for their significant impact on the central nervous system, leading to reports of both beneficial and adverse mental health effects. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
This mini-narrative review explores the relationship between diabetes and dementia, focusing on the potential mitigating role of metformin in reducing cognitive decline among individuals with type 2 diabetes. 1 key finding →
Design: longitudinal study
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
In this cohort study, statin therapy was not associated with a decreased risk of dementia. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 2,798
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Therefore, respective software was developed in-house.8,9 Segmentation results are then analysed for potential associations with disease risks and to establish reference intervals of organ size and function.10 SHIP is also used as a basis for meta-research with a particular focus on incidental MRI findings and their effects on study participants.11,12 With its large amount of standardized data and the option to internally replicate findings from SHIP-START using data of the independent SHIP-TREND, the project offers good opportunities to apply new bioinformatical tools to mine the data and gain new insights into risk factors and pathomechanisms. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
The 2020 pipeline has innovations in clinical trials and treatment targets that provide hope for greater success in AD drug development programs. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
59/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 59 out of 100.
·
Neurology
·
2022-03-25
We sought to identify cognitive measures associated with the earliest detectable signs of emerging Aβ and tau pathology. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
The increase in gray matter volume in these areas, which various neuroimaging and postmortem neuropathology studies have implicated in the neuropathophysiology of bipolar disorder, suggests that the observed effects may be linked to clinical response. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 28
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Promoting successful cognitive aging is a topic of major importance to individuals and the field of public health. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
56/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 56 out of 100.
·
Neurology
·
2024-08-09
The patient was participating in an extended open-label trial of aducanumab when she was admitted to hospital for focal seizures and ARIA in 2 noncontiguous regions of the left frontal and occipital lobes. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Full text may need a subscription
55/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 55 out of 100.
·
PLoS ONE
·
2026-08-24
Among 1,528,885 adults with type 2 diabetes (mean age, 58 years; 49.2% women), GLP-1 receptor agonists plus metformin were associated with lower incidence of vascular dementia (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.37-0.57), mild cognitive disorder (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66-0.95), and Alzheimer disease (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.31-0.70). 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 1,528,885
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
54/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 54 out of 100.
·
JAMA
·
2026-07-12
The long-term efficacy of amyloid-targeting therapies hinges on their ability to slow downstream neuropathologic change, but little is known about the influence of amyloid clearance on tau pathology and neurodegeneration. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Type 2 diabetes mellitus and Alzheimer's disease are both associated with increasing age, and each increases the risk of development of the other. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
GLP-1RA use was associated with lower risk of dementia (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.71–0.91) and Alzheimer’s disease (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.59–0.98) compared to DPP4is. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 12,351
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Full text may need a subscription
GLP-1RA use was associated with a significantly lower risk of dementia [hazard ratio (HR) 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-0.91, P = .001] and Alzheimer's disease (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.59-0.98, P = .033) compared with DPP4i use. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Full text may need a subscription
In October 2019, a Swiss panel of experts met for the Dementia Summit in Brunnen, Switzerland, to discuss the latest scientific findings on basic and clinical research, as well as practical and political approaches to the challenges of dementia disorders in Switzerland. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor,
and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a
scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the
difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself,
so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we
could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be
worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science,
Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed
journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the
tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a
missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores
zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and
the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed
article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or
a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not
work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by
that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is
reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out →
— four charts covering all 27,780 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap
bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on
stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.