All indicators of atherosclerosis were associated with dementia (odds ratios ranging from 1.3 to 1.9) and its major subtypes Alzheimer's disease (odds ratios 1.3-1.8) and vascular dementia (odds ratios 1.9-3.2). 4 key findings →
Participants: 284
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Full text may need a subscription
The prevalence of dementia increases exponentially with age. 1 key finding →
Participants: 7,528
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
62/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 62 out of 100.
·
JAMA neurology
·
2016-08-01
Microbleed prevalence was 15.3% (median [interquartile range] count, 1 [1-88]). 5 key findings →
Participants: 4,841
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
The association between blood pressure and dementia is debated. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 6,668
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Full text may need a subscription
62/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 62 out of 100.
·
Neurology
·
2005-06-01
Unsaturated fatty acids are important constituents of neuronal cell membranes and have neuroprotective, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory properties. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 5,289
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Full text may need a subscription
In the general population, the use of statins, but not of non-statin cholesterol-lowering drugs, was associated with a lower risk of AD compared with never use of cholesterol-lowering drugs. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional
Participants: 6,992
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
62/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 62 out of 100.
·
Neurology
·
1996-05-01
To review the evidence for risk factors of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), we pooled and reanalyzed the raw data of three case-control studies. 4 key findings →
Design: case-control study
Participants: 178
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
61/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 61 out of 100.
·
Neurology
·
2012-05-08
This Dutch cohort study compared dementia rates in two groups of older adults enrolled ten years apart. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort
Participants: 7,496
Evidence: preliminary
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
61/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 61 out of 100.
·
JAMA
·
2001-03-01
During 21 046 person-years of follow-up (median follow-up, 6.3 years), 199 women developed dementia, including 159 who developed AD. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 3,601
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Plasma levels of inflammatory proteins are increased before clinical onset of dementia, Alzheimer disease, and vascular dementia. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 6,713
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Full text may need a subscription
Silent brain infarcts and white matter lesions are frequently seen on magnetic resonance imaging in healthy elderly people and both are associated with an increased risk of stroke and dementia. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional
Participants: 1,077
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Full text may need a subscription
The average follow-up was 6.0 years. 4 key findings →
Participants: 5,395
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Full text may need a subscription
Several studies suggested that women are at higher risk of dementia than men. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 7,046
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Full text may need a subscription
Although memory complaints are associated with an increased risk of Alzheimer's disease in persons with cognitive impairment as well as in persons with normal cognition, they are commonly considered of less importance than objective cognitive measures. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 7,983
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Full text may need a subscription
60/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 60 out of 100.
·
BMC medicine
·
2015-07-21
A substantial part of dementia cases could be prevented if modifiable risk factors would be eliminated. 1 key finding →
Participants: 7,003
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
60/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 60 out of 100.
·
Stroke
·
1997-02-01
Dementia and subtypes Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia may be related to atrial fibrillation even if no clinical stokes have occurred. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional
Participants: 6,584
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Full text may need a subscription
60/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 60 out of 100.
·
Neurology
·
1999-12-01
It has been suggested that the risk might be particularly increased for carriers of the APOE-epsilon4 allele. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional
Participants: 6,645
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Full text may need a subscription
60/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 60 out of 100.
·
Neurology
·
2016-09-16
Analyses were performed within the Rotterdam Study (baseline 1997), a prospective, population-based cohort. 4 key findings →
Participants: 9,446
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Full text may need a subscription
Many people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) suffer from concomitant depression or anxiety. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional
Participants: 4,168
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
60/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 60 out of 100.
·
Neurology
·
2017-03-29
From 2000 to 2002, we assessed parental history of dementia in participants without dementia of the Rotterdam Study. 4 key findings →
Participants: 2,087
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
We investigated in a population-based cohort study the association of global and lobar brain tissue volumes with specific cognitive domains and risk of dementia. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 490
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
The prevalence and the degree of cerebral white matter lesions increased with age. 2 key findings →
Participants: 1,077
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Most prognostic studies on Parkinson disease have been hospital based or have applied register-based case-finding methods. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 6,969
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Full text may need a subscription
59/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 59 out of 100.
·
Neurology
·
2006-07-01
Increased homocysteine levels might accelerate dopaminergic cell death in Parkinson disease (PD), through neurotoxic effects. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 5,289
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Full text may need a subscription
In our study, TSH was related neither to risk of AD nor with early MRI markers thereof, arguing against an important role of thyroid function in the development of AD. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 1,025
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor,
and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a
scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the
difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself,
so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we
could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be
worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science,
Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed
journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the
tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a
missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores
zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and
the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed
article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or
a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not
work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by
that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is
reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out →
— four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap
bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on
stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.