64/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 64 out of 100.
·
Neuroepidemiology
·
2019-09-27
Linking detailed HCAP cognitive assessments to the wealth of available longitudinal HRS data on cognition, health, biomarkers, genetics, health care utilization, informal care, and economic resources and behavior will provide unique and expanded opportunities to study cognitive impairment and dementia in a nationally representative US population-based sample. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 3,496
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
T-tau, NfL, GFAP, and YKL-40 discriminated between diagnostic groups (receiver operating curve: 0.647-0.873). 5 key findings →
Participants: 1,193
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
64/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 64 out of 100.
·
MEDICC review
·
2019
The Panama Aging Research Initiative is a cohort study of 423 adults aged ≥65 years recruited from an outpatient geriatric department of Panama's largest public hospital, the Social Security Fund's Dr Arnulfo Arias Madrid Hospital Complex (Complejo Hospitalario Dr Arnulfo Arias Madrid de la Caja de Seguro Social). 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 423
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
In cross-sectional analyses at baseline, there was no association between DNAm age acceleration and cognitive function scores. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional
Participants: 266
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
In the SoUth Korean study to PrEvent cognitive impaiRment and protect BRAIN health through lifestyle intervention in at-risk elderly people (SUPERBRAIN), we evaluated the impact of multidomain lifestyle intervention on regional homogeneity (ReHo) in resting-state functional brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 56
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Two distinct literacy profiles emerged. The first group (N=121, 44%) had higher level of literacy at baseline, slower decline and less variabilities over time. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 121
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
By wave, compared with those who remained in the LBC1921 study at Waves 1 to 5, participants who dropped out had: significantly lower older-age IQ scores at Wave 1 Wave 2 = and Wave 3 = lower scores at Waves and at Waves 1 = and 2 = By wave, compared with those who remained in the LBC1936 study at Waves 1 to participants who dropped out had: significantly lower older-age IQ scores at Wave 1 Wave 2 = and Wave 3 = lower scores at Wave 1 = Wave 2 and Wave 3 = lower at Wave 1 = Wave 2 = and Wave 3 and lower physical as at Wave 1 Wave 2 = and Wave 3 = and at Wave 1 = at each wave in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1921 are mean and standard for and for each wave sample = Wave 1 = Waves 1 and 2 = Waves 2 and 3 = Waves IQ from Moray House Test for age in at time of testing and to IQ is the was from to from the in 1 and at Wave 1. as of from the Wave 2 two participants who not Wave 1. 1 key finding →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 87
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
A+/High-EA individuals exhibited slower cognitive decline in global cognition and language domains than A+/Low-EA individuals. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
In weighted models, greater loneliness was associated with microinfarcts, lower episodic and working memory in the absence of AD pathology, lower working memory in the absence of infarcts, a stronger association of infarcts with lower episodic memory, and a stronger association of microinfarcts with lower working and semantic memory. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional
Participants: 680
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
These results indicate that declines in connected speech may be related to preclinical AD. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
62/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 62 out of 100.
·
Atherosclerosis
·
2012-07-25
In this population-based longitudinal study, carotid IMT was associated with a higher risk of developing cognitive impairment during the 10-year follow-up, and was associated with poorer performance in a test of executive function 10 years later. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 1,651
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
ObjectivesIdentifying modifiable factors that shape cognitive aging trajectories is a central goal in aging research. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional
Participants: 4,140
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
The development of Alzheimer's disease (AD) later in life may be reflective of environmental factors operating over the course of a lifetime. 3 key findings →
Design: case-control study
Participants: 193
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Participants with faster DunedinPACE had poorer cognitive functioning at baseline and experienced more rapid cognitive decline over follow-up. 5 key findings →
Participants: 2,296
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Greater educational attainment and mental activity were associated with higher composite SPPB scores and those of its three subtests (p < 0.05). 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional
Participants: 4,714
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
An increased incidence of mild cognitive impairment was observed in community-dwelling elderly adults who had nonpsychotic psychiatric symptoms at baseline. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 365
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
It is unclear how or whether oral health and cognitive status are related. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Increasing frailty is associated with incident AD and the rate of cognitive decline in older persons. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 823
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
59/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 59 out of 100.
·
JAMA
·
2015-07-01
Incident stroke was associated with an acute decline in cognitive function and also accelerated and persistent cognitive decline over 6 years. 5 key findings →
Participants: 2,003
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Regular musical activity as a complex multimodal lifestyle activity is proposed to be protective against age-related cognitive decline and Alzheimer's disease. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional
Participants: 70
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Previous studies have demonstrated resilience to AD-related neuropathology in a form of cognitive reserve (CR). 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Blacks and Hispanics were more prone to falsely positive perceptions of their cognitive function in the presence of cognitive impairment than non-Hispanic Whites. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional
Participants: 3,096
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Later birth year was associated with higher initial cognitive levels for Whites and Blacks, but not Hispanics. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Compared with food secure older adults, those reporting food insecurity experienced worsened cognitive functioning over time (B = -0.63, p < .001), and they were more likely to have onset of cognitive impairment (OR= 1.46, p < .001) in the 6-y observation. 5 key findings →
Participants: 6,638
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Positive associations between self-efficacy and language did not significantly differ across race/ethnicity, although the bivariate association between self-efficacy and language was not significant among Hispanics. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional
Participants: 548
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor,
and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a
scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the
difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself,
so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we
could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be
worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science,
Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed
journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the
tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a
missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores
zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and
the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed
article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or
a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not
work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by
that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is
reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out →
— four charts covering all 27,780 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap
bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on
stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.