27,780 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Read the article, “Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia: How Long Does Every Behavior Last, and Are Particular Behaviors Associated With PRN Antipsychotic Agent Use?” found on pages 22–37, carefully noting any tables and other illustrative materials that are included to enhance your knowledge and understanding of the content. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The phase III program for Auvelity, showed that the drug was well tolerated with the most common side effects being dizziness, headache, and dry mouth. 86 Another novel antidepressant agent approved in 2023 is zuranolone (Zurzuvae). 5 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 407 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In a 6-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 100 to 150 mg/d indomethacin appeared to protect mild to moderately impaired Alzheimer's disease patients from the degree of cognitive decline exhibited by a well-matched, placebo-treated group. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
This controlled study showed significant short-term efficacy of carbamazepine for agitation with generally good safety and tolerability. 5 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The restricted use of BDZRs may contribute to dementia prevention in the elderly. 4 key findings →
Design: case-control study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Among 275,144 initiators of DPP-4 inhibitors or sulfonylureas, followed for 750,846 person-years, DPP-4 inhibitors were associated with a reduced dementia risk compared with sulfonylureas (4.4 vs. 5.7 events per 1000 person-years; HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.71-0.85). 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson's disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. 5 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is a neurodegenerative disorder often neuropathologically associated with the accumulation of abnormally hyperphosphorylated tau, for which there is currently no disease-modifying treatment. 2 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Patients treated with bryostatin pre-specified at Mini-Mental State Examination scores 10-14, without memantine, showed baseline balance, complete safety, and SIB improvements at 13 weeks with multiple imputation analysis: Study #203 = 4.1 SIB points above baseline (p = 0.005), and Study #202 = 4.2 SIB points above baseline (p = 0.016). 3 key findings →
Participants: 95 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Adverse drug reactions causing cognitive impairment are an important problem in the elderly. 4 key findings →
Participants: 300 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
STOPP criteria PIMs, unlike Beers criteria PIMs, are significantly associated with avoidable ADEs in older people that cause or contribute to urgent hospitalization. 5 key findings →
Participants: 600 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The incidence of hip fracture appears to be associated with benzodiazepine use. 3 key findings →
Participants: 125 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Community-based, commercially insured, older adults with probable dementia are more likely to take anticholinergics than matched controls. 2 key findings →
Participants: 418 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Agitation is common and distressing in patients with Alzheimer-type dementia, but safe, effective treatments remain elusive. 1 key finding →
Participants: 200 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Donepezil is a central-acting acetylcholinesterase inhibitor aimed at increasing acetylcholine availability at the neuron synapses to enhance cholinergic transmission. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In relation to placebo, the last observation in phase 1 showed greater improvement with olanzapine or risperidone on the Neuropsychiatric Inventory total score, risperidone on the Clinical Global Impression of Changes, olanzapine and risperidone on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) hostile suspiciousness factor, and risperidone on the BPRS psychosis factor. 5 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 421 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The predefined superiority of donepezil to the placebo was not confirmed in either active group in the primary analysis. 5 key findings →
Participants: 142 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Sixty percent of the total patient group had baseline symptoms of agitation/aggression, delusions, or hallucinations on the NPI. 5 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The overall objective of the guideline is to provide up‐to‐date, evidence‐based recommendations for the management of bullous pemphigoid (BP). 5 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Seventy-one patients completed the trial. 5 key findings →
Participants: 36 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A total of 13 case reports were found (10 for donepezil, 2 for galantamine and 1 for rivastigmine) with rate corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation. 5 key findings →
Design: case report Participants: 13 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Recipients of galantamine 16 or 24 mg/day achieved significant improvements in cognitive and global symptoms relative to placebo recipients in large (n = 285 to 978 patients with mild to moderate AD) well-designed trials of 3 to 6 months' duration. 4 key findings →
Participants: 285 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Out of 538 articles, 23 (4.27%) were published in journals from the geriatric category, 44 (8.18%) included an author affiliated with a geriatric institution. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the influences of cholinesterase inhibitors on sleep pattern and sleep disturbance. 3 key findings →
Participants: 87 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Crude AD prevalence (2015-2020) was estimated at 760.5 per 100,000 inhabitants, and age-standardized prevalence (2020) was 664.6 (male 595.7, female 711.0). 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
10 of the 271 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,780 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,780 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.1% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.3%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →