Neuronal active Caspase-6 (Casp6) is associated with Alzheimer disease (AD), cognitive impairment, and axonal degeneration. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Neuronal active Caspase-6 (Casp6) is associated with Alzheimer disease (AD), cognitive impairment, and axonal degeneration. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
For years, it has been reported that Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a devastating neurodegenerative disorder and a leading cause of dementia, with accumulation of amyloid-beta (Aβ) and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) as defining pathological features. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Although epidemiological data associate hypertension with a strong predisposition to develop Alzheimer disease, no mechanistic explanation exists so far. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Previously, the contribution of peripheral infection to cognitive decline was largely overlooked however, the past 15 years have established a key role for infectious pathogens in the progression of age-related neurodegeneration. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Advances in neuroimaging have enabled greater understanding of the progression of cerebral degenerative processes associated with ageing-related dementias. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Immunotherapeutic approaches are currently in the spotlight for their potential as disease-modifying treatments for neurodegenerative disorders. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Alzheimer disease is characterized by neuronal loss and brain plaques of extracellular amyloid β (Aβ), but the means by which Aβ may induce neuronal loss is not entirely clear. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A consequence of our progressively ageing global population is the increasing prevalence of worldwide age-related cognitive decline and dementia. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Drug repositioning and repurposing can enhance traditional drug development efforts and could accelerate the identification of new treatments for individuals with Alzheimer disease (AD) dementia and mild cognitive impairment. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Brain iron accumulation has been found to accelerate disease progression in amyloid-β(Aβ) positive Alzheimer patients, though the mechanism is still unknown. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Using positron emission tomography and [(11)C](R)-PK11195, a marker of "peripheral benzodiazepine sites" that is upregulated on activated microglia during progressive tissue pathology, we show increased binding of [(11)C](R)-PK11195 in frontotemporal lobar degeneration in the typically affected frontotemporal brain regions. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Loss of physiological microglial function may increase the propagation of neurodegenerative diseases. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Process evaluations confirmed satisfaction and high completion rates of the program. 5 key findings →
Participants: 150 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Our findings suggest that non-economic social deprivation, especially in terms of access to a grocery store, pharmacy, postal office, and bus stop, might be relevant for maintaining cognitive functioning in old age. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 91 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
TBI had the highest percentage (37%) compared to other conditions, which may be attributed to the prevalent challenge of cognitive impairment in TBI in addition to physical disability. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 2,285 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In 2014 and 2016, the overall prevalence of AD/ADRD diagnoses was 5.6% and 6.5%, respectively. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Receipt of potentially burdensome hospitalizations and treatments; receipt of postdischarge home and facility care. 5 key findings →
Participants: 659 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Prior authorization criteria for Federal Drug Administration (FDA) approved immunotherapeutics, among the class of anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), established by state drug formulary committees, are tailored for adults with late-onset Alzheimer's disease. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Of the 508 eligible MA enrollees, mean age was 82.8 (SD = 7.2) years, 81% were female, and 49% were non-Latino White; 62 participants (12%) were classified as having dementia by the cohort assessment. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 62 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
To ensure diversity, we developed a comprehensive recruitment strategy using a diverse, culturally‐trained staff that includes : • Identifying Dementia Specialists experienced recruiting minorities • Embedding high‐impact community engagement in select regions • Increasing capacity of specialists and PET facilities to engage minorities • Increasing pipeline of referrals to Dementia Specialists • Creating a culturally‐informed awareness campaign Result New IDEAS has enrolled 4,524 participants including 954 (21.1%) Black/African American, and 842 (18.6%) Hispanic/Latinx. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 4,524 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The reanalyzed study population (aged 70 year and above) was composed of Central and North-Eastern Spanish sub-populations obtained from 9 surveys and totaled 12,232 persons and 1,194 cases of dementia (707 of Alzheimer's disease, 238 of vascular dementia). 5 key findings →
Participants: 12,232 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Maintaining driving independence is important for older adults. 2 key findings →
Participants: 230 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Crude new ADRD diagnosis rate ranged from 1.7 to 5.4 per 100 across HRRs. 5 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Without adaptation, ADD heatwave-attributable deaths are projected to rise sharply, especially under rapid socioeconomic development with high greenhouse gas emissions scenario (SSP5-RCP8.5) in the 2080s, which reach 59,088-an 11-fold (+1003%) increase comparing to 2010s levels. 5 key findings →
Participants: 399,036 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled.
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →