This study investigates the role of individual and area-level social health factors in shaping geographic variation in dementia incidence among older adults in Finland. 1 key finding →
Participants: 185,712
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
The Centiloid method demonstrates strong intertracer and interscanner harmonization when standardized to the 11C-Pittsburgh compound B reference, with high correlation (r2 > 0.9) across 18F-labeled tracers, including florbetapir, flutemetamol, and florbetaben. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
A total of 30 variants were overrepresented in four pathways: presenilin/Alzheimer disease, cadherin/WNT signaling, gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor, and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signaling. 5 key findings →
Participants: 204
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Higher AD-PRS was associated with faster CD in the full clinical cohort and in biomarker subset, independently of APOE genotype. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 7,233
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Pivotal trials demonstrated statistically significant but modest average slowing of decline: Clarity AD showed a 0.45-point between-group difference in CDR-SB worsening at 18 months, and TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 showed a 3.25-point iADRS difference in the low/medium-tau population at 76 weeks. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
47/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 47 out of 100.
·
BMC Geriatrics
·
2026-01-27
Thirty-three studies were included, most published after 2019 (72.7%). 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Despite comprising the largest segment of the sexual minority population and experiencing unique stressors and health disparities, bi+ dementia caregivers remain underrepresented in health and caregiving research. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional
Participants: 125
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Novel insights into Alzheimer's disease through the study of individuals with Down syndromePeople with Down syndrome (DS) represent the largest genetically defined population at risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD). 1 Virtually all adults with DS develop AD neuropathology by midlife due to triplication of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) gene on chromosome 21.As medical advances and social integration have extended life expectancy into the 60s, AD has emerged as the major determinant of cognitive decline, morbidity, and mortality in this DS population. 2 What was once viewed as an inevitable consequence of aging in DS is now recognized as a unique scientific opportunity to uncover the earliest events that drive AD.The predictable and accelerated course of DS-associated AD (DSAD) provides an unparalleled window into the molecular and cellular origins of amyloid and tau pathology, neuroinflammation, cerebrovascular pathology, and neurodegeneration. 1 key finding →
Design: longitudinal study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
These findings provide no evidence of a group-level Alzheimer-related p-tau217 elevation in young people with DSRD and support DSRD as a condition distinct from Alzheimer’s disease. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 132
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
47/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 47 out of 100.
·
Acta Psychologica
·
2026-01-23
Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is increasingly recognised as a potential preclinical stage of Alzheimer's disease, yet the physiological mechanisms underlying its progression remain poorly understood. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Epidemiological studies consistently indicate a two- to threefold increased risk of dementia among individuals with schizophrenia, although estimates vary due to diagnostic and ascertainment biases. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
47/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 47 out of 100.
·
Neurology
·
2026-07-22
Of the 500 eligible participants (71% female, 95% non-Latino White, mean [SD] age at cohort dementia onset = 88 [7] years, mean [SD] years from onset to death = 4 [3]), only 54% received a timely diagnosis. 5 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's Disease (AD), Parkinson's Disease (PD), Lewy Body Disease (LBD), and related dementias, represent a global health challenge, particularly in aging populations. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
MCI patients showed significantly reduced plasma levels of TGF-β1 and increased TNF-α concentrations compared to other participants. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional
Participants: 37
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
47/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 47 out of 100.
·
EXCLI journal
·
2026-01-25
Cognitive decline and dementia represent major and growing global health challenges, driven largely by population aging and increased longevity. 3 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
In a sample of 2,599 Medicare beneficiaries (mean age 78.4 years, 52.9% female, 81.8% White), we identified a total of 5,677 hospitalization claims. 5 key findings →
Participants: 5,677
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
47/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 47 out of 100.
·
PLoS Medicine
·
2026-03-02
A case-control GWAS was performed in the UK Biobank to identify genetic variants associated with postoperative delirium, adjusted for age, sex, genetic chip, and the first 10 principal components. 5 key findings →
Design: case-control study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Eighteen members of the public-including patients, carers, and individuals with lived experience of both roles-along with two local board members and one representative from a statutory health and social care body, participated and were actively involved in developing the framework and co-producing outputs through structured small-group discussions. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
End-of-life care in elderly patients with serious advanced illness sits at the intersection of patient autonomy, family involvement, clinical judgment, and resource allocation. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 358
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Between 2000 and 2024, deaths from stroke, heart disease, and HIV decreased, whereas reported deaths from AD increased 134%. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular dementia (VaD) exhibit distinct neuropathological hallmarks, with AD defined by cortical amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles, while VaD arises primarily from cerebrovascular disease (CeVD). 4 key findings →
Participants: 531
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
No amyloid-related imaging abnormalities occurred. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
MODERN MEDICINE VERSUS LIFESTYLE MEDICINE Conventional biomedicine excels in acute care, diagnostics, therapeutics and emergencies. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
46/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 46 out of 100.
·
JAMA Network Open
·
2026-03-13
Among 5353 MA beneficiary observations (1239 [23.1%] aged 65-74 years; 3127 [58.4%] aged ≥75 years; 1785 male [33.3%]), 1629 (30.4%) reported a diagnosis of ADRD, and 3724 (69.6%) did not report an ADRD diagnosis. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
46/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 46 out of 100.
·
JAMA Health Forum
·
2026-03-27
In a sample of 1218 new HCBS users (75% female, 77% Black; mean [SD] age, 70.5 [7.5] years), Medicaid HCBS initiation was associated with a decrease in probability of ED use (-2.70 percentage points; 95% CI, -4.18 to -1.22 percentage points) and a decrease in probability of inpatient discharge (-2.63 percentage points; 95% CI, -3.75 to -1.51 percentage points). 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor,
and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a
scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the
difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself,
so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we
could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be
worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science,
Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed
journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the
tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a
missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores
zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and
the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed
article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or
a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not
work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by
that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is
reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out →
— four charts covering all 30,980 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap
bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on
stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.