27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
The primary outcome of this clinical trial is the change in the Vascular Dementia Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale from baseline to 12 months. 3 key findings →
Participants: 1,052 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Dementia is a leading global cause of morbidity and mortality. 2 key findings →
Participants: 15 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Data point to a role for midlife vascular risk factors in the development of MCI in late life.
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
High peripheral AGE level is associated with greater cognitive decline in older adults with and without diabetes. 5 key findings →
Participants: 920 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
We investigated the incidence and extent of Lewy body (LB)-related alpha-synucleinopathy (LBAS) in the olfactory bulb (OB) in 320 consecutive autopsy patients from a general geriatric hospital (mean age, 81.5 +/- 8.5 years). 1 key finding →
Participants: 102 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Prolonged delirium was found to be associated with a poor functional outcome and increased mortality. 3 key findings →
Participants: 110 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Diabetic patients are at increased risk for stroke, but little is known about the presence of other brain lesions. 3 key findings →
Participants: 1,252 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Low and high thyrotropin levels were associated with an increased risk of incident AD in women but not in men. 5 key findings →
Participants: 209 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In a population of cognitively unimpaired adults with increased risk of AD, long-term exposure to air pollution was associated with higher levels in biomarkers of AD pathology. 5 key findings →
Participants: 156 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
High plasma HDL cholesterol was observationally associated with increased risk of any dementia and Alzheimer's disease, suggesting that HDL cholesterol can be used as an easily accessible plasma biomarker for individual risk assessment. 5 key findings →
Participants: 111 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Our study confirms the strong link between hearing status and the risk of disability, dementia, and depression. 4 key findings →
Participants: 3,777 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
These constituents have shown a reduction in blood glucose levels. 5 key findings →
Participants: 463 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In both the British and French studies, ten health conditions were significantly positively associated with increased Alzheimer's disease risk, in a window of exposure from 2-10 years before Alzheimer's disease diagnosis, comprising major depressive disorder (UK OR 1·34, 95% CI 1·23-1·46; France OR 1·73, 1·57-1·91), anxiety (UK OR 1·36, 1·25-1·47; France OR 1·50, 1·36-1·65), reaction to severe stress and adjustment disorders (UK OR 1·40, 1·24-1·59; France OR 1·83, 1·55-2·15), hearing loss (UK OR 1·19, 1·11-1·28; France OR 1·51, 1·21-1·89), constipation (UK OR 1·31, 1·22-1·41; France OR 1·59, 1·44-1·75), spondylosis (UK OR 1·26, 1·14-1·39; France OR 1·62, 1·44-1·81), abnormal weight loss (UK OR 1·47, 1·33-1·63; France OR 1·88, 1·56-2·26), malaise and fatigue (UK OR 1·23, 1·14-1·32; France OR 1·59, 1·46-1·73), memory loss (UK OR 7·63, 6·65-8·76; France OR 4·41, 3·07-6·34), and syncope and collapse (UK OR 1·23, 1·10-1·37; France OR 1·57, 1·26-1·96). 4 key findings →
Participants: 214 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
To address this, we first examined the prevalence of type 2 diabetes in a community-based controlled study, the Mayo Clinic Alzheimer Disease Patient Registry (ADPR), which follows patients with Alzheimer disease versus control subjects without Alzheimer disease. 2 key findings →
Participants: 100 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Preliminary studies have shown associations between chronic pesticide exposure in occupational settings and neurological disorders. 3 key findings →
Participants: 17,429 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Asthma, allergic rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis were significantly associated with increased risk of all-cause dementia and subtypes, with dose-effect relationships with the severity of allergic diseases. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Proneness to experience psychological distress is a risk factor for AD, an effect independent of AD pathologic markers such as cortical plaques and tangles. 3 key findings →
Participants: 140 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is a complex polygenic neurodegenerative disorder. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Apolipoprotein E (APOE) plays a pivotal role in lipid including cholesterol metabolism. 2 key findings →
Participants: 19 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Although Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a central nervous system disease and type 2 diabetes MELLITUS (T2DM) is a metabolic disorder, an increasing number of genetic epidemiological studies show clear link between AD and T2DM. 5 key findings →
Participants: 448 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
This case suggests that mirtazapine may be beneficial in mitigating GLP-1 RA-induced gastrointestinal side effects, thereby improving adherence and therapeutic efficacy. 4 key findings →
Design: case report Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
This article describes the protocol for the Systematic Multi-domain Alzheimer's Risk Reduction Trial (SMARRT), a single-blind randomized pilot trial to test a personalized, pragmatic, multi-domain Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk reduction intervention in a US integrated healthcare delivery system. 1 key finding →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Cerebrovascular dysfunction likely contributes causally to Alzheimer's disease (AD). 1 key finding →
Participants: 44 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Hearing loss is an important risk factor for the development of dementia, particularly Alzheimer's disease (AD). 1 key finding →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Genetically determined CSHL was associated with an elevated risk of DLB (odds ratio [OR] 1.69; 95% CI 1.08 to 2.63; P = 0.021) and FTD (OR 1.66; 1.04 to 2.67; P = 0.035), but not AD (P = 0.958). 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
10 of the 3,247 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →